Economic development, income inequality and preferences for redistribution *

137 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Who Gives, Who Gains? Progressivity and Preferences (2016, background): “…age); these coefficients refer to around 2006, and are recovered from a multi-level model.1 Income has almost always a negative effect on support for redistribution across rich democracies, but the diversity in the magnitude of the effect is striking (Dion, 2010; Dion & Birchfield, 2010).”
Economic inequality and public demand for redistribution: combining cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence (2016, background): “…inequality and demand for redistribution is that the analyses are either cross-sectional (for example, Lübker, 2007; Finseraas, 2009; Dallinger, 2010; Dion and Birchfield, 2010) or longitudinal but rely on aggregated data (for example, Aalberg, 2003; Kenworthy and McCall, 2008; Jæger, 2013).”
The effect of macroeconomic and social conditions on the demand for redistribution: A pseudo panel approach (2013, background): “…that income inequality, typically measured via the GINI coefficient, is negatively correlated with the demand for redistribution (Dallinger, 2010; Dion and Birchfield, 2010; Finseraas, 2009).1 Fourth, studies find that total social expenditure as a percentage of GDP is positively correlated with…”