Genotoxicity investigations on nanomaterials: methods, preparation and characterization of test material, potential artifacts and limitations--many questions, some answers.
By R. Landsiedel, M. D. Kapp, Markus Schulz, K. Wiench, Franz Oesch. Mutation research, 2009
369 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Materials Chemistry, Pollution
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/19ca2fdfa6f0870122d8f8df9b8673c2f5fddca0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- E. Demir
- N. Kaya
- Neenu Singh
- B. Kaya
- B. Drasler
- G. Jenkins
- Phil Sayre
- S. Doak
Citations in the corpus
- Genotoxic effects of zinc oxide and titanium dioxide nanoparticles on root meristem cells of Allium cepa by comet assay (2014, background): “For these reasons nanotoxicology and nanogenotoxicology are expanding as novel fields that are looking for the potential risk of nanomaterials as well as their possible mechanisms of action (Landsiedel et al., 2009; Singh et al., 2009; Ai et al., 2011).”
- In vitro approaches to assess the hazard of nanomaterials (2017, background): “zinc oxide, titanium dioxide, magnetic NPs) were negative (Landsiedel et al., 2009).”
- NanoGenotoxicology: the DNA damaging potential of engineered nanomaterials. (2009, background): “Two recent reviews have also addressed this issue and have made recommendations focused around ensuring adequate materials characterisation, use of standardised experimental methods and assessment of the correlation between in vitro and in vivo results [192,193].”