Bellagio STAMP: Principles for sustainability assessment and measurement

By L. Pintér, Peter Hardi, A. Martinuzzi, Jon Hall. 2012

315 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/19887b269c69b29fc8f7d335af361f3880d51052

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. D. Dokken
2. A. Gasparatos
3. K. Mach
4. A. Scolobig
5. Christopher B. Field
6. V. Barros
7. M. Mastrandrea
8. Richard S. J. Tol

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. A. Gasparatos
2. A. Scolobig
3. Serenella Sala

Citations in the corpus

• Comparing the sustainability of local and global food products in Europe (2017, unknown): “This selection of attributes was necessary as they need to be adapted to local and sectorial contexts for feasibility and relevance (Morrison-Saunders and Pope, 2013; Pinter et al., 2012).”
• Ten reflective steps for rendering research societally relevant (2017, background): “…general transdisciplinarity principles and present case studies (Pohl and Hirsch Hadorn 2007, Hirsch Hadorn et al. 2008, Carew and Wickson 2010, Lang et al. 2012), or provide guidelines for research for sustainable development (Wies mann and Hurni 2011, Pintér et al. 2012, Helming et al. 2016).”
• Climate-Resilient Pathways: Adaptation, Mitigation, and Sustainable Development (2014, background): “This entails integrating multiple objectives and policy goals in order to promote responses to climate change that contribute to resilience and that are sustainable as social and policy conditions change (Meadowcroft, 2000; Tompkins and Adger, 2004; Pintér et al., 2011).”
• A systemic framework for sustainability assessment (2015, methodology): “It was first developed in 1996, and, was recently broadened and revisited (Pinter et al., 2012).”
• The Imperatives of Sustainable Development (2017, unknown): “Since then, many indicators, indicator sets and dashboards, compound (composite and aggregated) indicators, and compound indices have been introduced (e.g., UNCSD, 1996 and 2007; Holden and Linnerud, 2007; Pintér et al., 2012; Dahl, 2012; Holden et al., 2014; Hák et al., 2016; UNSD, 2015).”
• Choosing the most appropriate sustainability assessment tool (2012, background): “development” has been proposed as themost appropriate (Pintér et al., 2012).”