Computing Response Metrics for Online Panels

529 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Determinants of Turnout and Candidate Choice in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Illuminating the Impact of Racial Prejudice and Other Considerations (2009, background): “A total of 2,779 individuals were invited to complete the Wave 6 questionnaire (August 27 to September 6, 2008), and 2,012 individuals did so (completion rate = 72.4 percent; cumulative response rate CUMRR1 = 10.4 percent; see Callegaro and DiSagra 2008).”
Explaining Females’ Envy Toward Social Media Influencers (2018, methodology): “Both were calculated based on the formula that Callegaro and DiSogra (2008) suggested for opt-in online panels.”
“Fracking” Controversy and Communication: Using National Survey Data to Understand Public Perceptions of Hydraulic Fracturing (2014, unknown): “2% (Callegaro and DiSogra, 2008).”
The Mutual Reinforcement of Media Selectivity and Effects: Testing the Reinforcing Spirals Framework in the Context of Global Warming (2014, unknown): “1 For more information about response rates for online panels see Callegaro and DiSogra (2008).”
Misinformed About the Affordable Care Act? Leveraging Certainty to Assess the Prevalence of Misperceptions (2015, unknown): “The response rates for the 2010 and 2012 surveys (cumulative with panel recruitment, CUMMRR3) were 12.0 and 9.9%, respectively (see Callegaro & Disogra, 2008).”