Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response
By Michael E. Goddard. Genetica, 2009
1,061 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Genetics, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/197c241b54bce47e1803ca889fa8f93194dfa42c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Genetics
- Jean-Luc Jannink
- M. Sorrells
- Alkes L Price
- Frank Dudbridge
- Peter M. Visscher
- Naomi R. Wray
- Jian Yang
- R. Bernardo
In Plant Science
- Jean-Luc Jannink
- M. Sorrells
- E. Heffner
- Hans D. Daetwyler
- A. Lorenz
- F. Işık
- R. Bernardo
- Kevin P. Smith
Citations in the corpus
- Genomic Selection Accuracy using Multifamily Prediction Models in a Wheat Breeding Program (2011, methodology): “Ridge regression best linear unbiased prediction is equivalent to estimating markers eff ects with a realized-relationship matrix determined from markers (Habier et al., 2007; Goddard, 2009; Piepho, 2009).”
- Perspectives for Genomic Selection Applications and Research in Plants (2015, positive): “A selection index can be used including the estimated marker effect and allele frequency to prevent the loss of low-frequency alleles to preserve long-term gains (Goddard, 2009).”
- Genomic selection for durable stem rust resistance in wheat (2011, background): “Accurate estimation of QTL effects in SCs is achieved by increasing the number of training records (Hayes et al. 2009b; Zhong et al. 2009) and by reestimating QTL effects in the population where the allele frequencies (and therefore QTL effects) and LD structure change due to selection ( Goddard 200”
- REVIEW: PART OF A HIGHLIGHT ON BREEDING STRATEGIES FOR FORAGE AND GRASS IMPROVEMENT Will genomic selection be a practical method for plant breeding? (2012, background): “Goddard (2009) and Jannink et al. (2010) surveyed the dynamics of long-term selection responses by performing simulation studies, and concluded that GS leads to a more rapid decline in the selection response than PS unless new markers are continually added to the prediction of breeding value.”
- Variable Selection in Heterogeneous Datasets: A Truncated-rank Sparse Linear Mixed Model with Applications to Genome-wide Association Studies (2017, methodology): “, such as when it arises from distinct subpopulations, two popular approaches for addressing this are principal component analysis [13] and linear mixed models [2], [14].”
- Modeling Linkage Disequilibrium Increases Accuracy of Polygenic Risk Scores (2015, background): “However, calculating the posterior mean under this model is non-trivial but can be solved numerically.(61) Alternatively, the posterior mode has a simple analytical form.”
- Genomewide Prediction Accuracy within 969 Maize Biparental Populations (2014, methodology): “The Me pertains to the idealized concept of having independent chromosome segments, with each segment containing a QTL–marker pair and with all the QTL having additive, equal effects (Daetwyler et al., 2008; Goddard, 2009).”
- Using Genetic Distance to Infer the Accuracy of Genomic Prediction (2015, background): “The accuracy of genomic predictions will depend on a number of factors: relatedness among genotyped individuals [7, 8]; the density of the markers [7, 9, 10]; and the genetic architecture of the trait, in particular the allele frequencies of causal variants [11, 12] and the distribution of their eff”
- Marker-Assisted Plant Breeding: Principles and Practices (2015, background): “allele frequency at each marker locus (Goddard 2009).”
- Genomic selection in plant breeding: from theory to practice. (2010, background): “For example, Goddard [71] proposed varying the weight given to marker information as a function of the allele frequencies at each marker [19].”
- Genomic selection in forest tree breeding (2011, methodology): “2001), a number of simulation studies have evaluated some of the parameters that impact the expected performance of genomic selection and compared the selection efficiency with conventional phenotype-based selection methods (Dekkers 2007; Goddard 2009; Goddard and Hayes 2009; Heffner et al. 2009; Ni”
- Genomic Selection Accuracy for Grain Quality Traits in Biparental Wheat Populations (2011, background): “Goddard (2009) and Piepho (2009) showed that RR is equivalent to a model where a realized-relationship matrix is determined from marker information to estimate marker eff ects (Habier et al.”
- Development and Application of High-density SNP Arrays in Genomic Studies of Domestic Animals (2010, neutral): “Based on most of the studies using simulated data (Goddard, 2009; Hayes et al., 2009b), several major factors which influence the accuracy of genomic selection were recognized: i) the LD extent between SNPs and the QTL; ii) the size of the training population (the individuals both phenotyped and gen”
- Genomic evaluation of cattle in a multi-breed context ☆ (2014, background): “As a consequence, the formula describing the effectiveness of genomic prediction (Goddard, 2009) cannot be used directly in the multibreed context.”
- Mapping genes for complex traits in domestic animals and their use in breeding programmes (2009, methodology): “Some of the statistical methods for genomic selection have been reviewed elsewher”