REVIEW: PART OF A HIGHLIGHT ON BREEDING STRATEGIES FOR FORAGE AND GRASS IMPROVEMENT Will genomic selection be a practical method for plant breeding?
By Akihiro Nakaya, Sachiko Isobe, Kazusa Kamatari. 2012
253 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c9e413b576367bc1ebef8994d50bc33b3ad3a87e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- M. Seleiman
- N. Al-Suhaibani
- N. Ali
- Michael B. Jones
- M. Akmal
- Majed A. Alotaibi
- Y. Refay
- T. Dindaroğlu
Citations in the corpus
- Drought Stress Impacts on Plants and Different Approaches to Alleviate Its Adverse Effects (2021, background): “Contrary to MAS, the knowledge of QTLs is not the prerequisite for GS [107].”
- Morphological and physiological traits for higher biomass production in perennial rhizomatous grasses grown on marginal land (2015, methodology): “The GS approach was initially used successfully in animals especially cattle but has also recently been used in plants including Arabidopsis, maize and wheat (Nakaya & Isobe, 2012).”
- Molecular Markers and Marker-Assisted Breeding in Plants (2013, methodology): “Subsequently, GEBVs are used for the selection of desirable individuals in the breeding phase, instead of the genotypes of markers used in traditional MAS.”