DNA barcoding of Neotropical bats: species identification and discovery within Guyana

By Elizabeth Clare, B. Lim, M. Engstrom, J. Eger, Paul D. N. Hebert. 2007

339 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/196be89e3def1d188888785d5a1022bf019ac3b5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Genetics

Citations in the corpus

The campaign to DNA barcode all fishes, FISH-BOL. (2009, background): “…2007), both invertebrate and vertebrate (e.g. springtails, Hogg & Hebert, 2004; butterflies, Hebert et al., 2004a; Hajibabaei et al., 2006a, but see Elias et al., 2007; crustaceans, Costa et al., 2007; Lefebure et al., 2006; birds, Hebert et al., 2004b; Yoo et al., 2006; bats, Clare et al., 2007).”
Prospects for using DNA barcoding to identify spiders in species-rich genera (2009, background): “For example, mean intraspecifi c divergence was 0.6% in 81 of 87 species of bats examined in Guyana (Clare et al. 2007) and just 0.23% in North American birds (Kerr et al. 2007).”
Exploiting generic platform technologies for the detection and identification of plant pathogens (2008, background): “Recent projects have targeted birds (Hebert et al. 2004; Kerr et al. 2007), fish (Ward et al. 2005), bats (Clare et al. 2007), fungi (Seifert et al. 2007), and invertebrates (Ball et al. 2006).”
Who’s calling? Acoustic identification of Brazilian bats (2018, background): “…show very large distribution ranges, and recent works have already revealed complexes of species within the same taxon [e.g., Pteronotus parnellii (López-Wilchis et al. 2016), genus Sturnira (Velazco and Patterson 2013), Plathyrhinus (Velazco 2005), Saccopteryx and Cormura (Clare et al. 2007)].”
DNA barcoding reveals cryptic diversity in marine hydroids (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa) from coastal and deep‐sea environments (2007, background): “To date, DNA barcoding projects have been broadly tested on known taxa, and have tended to successfully identify > 95% of target species (Hebert et al. 2004a,b; Hebert & Gregory 2005; Ward et al. 2005; Clare et al. 2006; Cywinska et al. 2006; Hajibabaei et al. 2006).”
ABGD, Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery for primary species delimitation (2012, result): “…rbcl for plants; CBOL Plant Working Group 2009) for a large number of individuals, and then by comparing the results obtained with previous knowledge of species boundaries (e.g. Armstrong & Ball 2005; Clare et al. 2006; Costa et al. 2007; Kerr et al. 2007; van Velzen et al. 2007; Rach et al. 2008).”
Systematics of the Platyrrhinus helleri species complex (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae), with descriptions of two new species (2010, methodology): “Clare et al. (2007) and Borisenko et al. (2008), using the mitochondrial cytochrome-c oxidase subunit 1 (COI), found three different lineages in population samples identified as P. helleri from Guyana and Suriname, respectively.”
Assigning morphological variants of Fucus (Fucales, Phaeophyceae) in Canadian waters to recognized species using DNA barcoding (2008, methodology): “It is necessary to reiterate that DNA barcoding is a tool for assigning biological specimens to species (Hebert et al. 2003a, 2003b; Schander and Willassen 2005; Borisenko et al. 2007; Clare et al. 2007).”
DNA barcoding of shared fish species from the North Atlantic and Australasia: minimal divergence for most taxa, but Zeus faber and Lepidopus caudatus each probably constitute two species (2008, background): “…shown to provide species level resolution of the vast bulk of species in a wide range of animal taxa, including ants, bats, birds, butterflies, crustaceans, fish, and spiders (Hebert et al. 2004a,b, Barrett & Hebert 2005, Smith et al. 2005, Ward et al. 2005, Clare et al. 2007, Costa et al. 2007).”
Comparative analysis of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene in ciliates (Alveolata, Ciliophora) and evaluation of its suitability as a biodiversity marker (2010, neutral): “, 2005 ; Hajibabaei et al. , 2006 ; Clare et al.”
DNA barcoding of Scandinavian birds reveals divergent lineages in trans-Atlantic species (2010, positive): “This marker features high resolution in many of the animal groups studies so far, e.g., Neotropical bats (Clare et al. 2007), North American birds (Kerr et al. 2007), Communicated by M. Wink.”
Bat Systematics in the Light of Unconstrained Analyses of a Comprehensive Molecular Supermatrix (2018, methodology): “This marker is of extended use in bats as barcoding tool (e.g., Clare et al. 2007; Kruskop et al. 2012; Wilson et al. 2014) and also in phylogenetic analyses (e.g., Shi and Rabosky 2015).”