The future of health behavior change research: What is needed to improve translation of research into health promotion practice?

By Russell E. Glasgow, L. Klesges, D. Dzewaltowski, S. Bull, Paul Estabrooks. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 2004

632 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, General Health Professions

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/18d530bdf8142d4a484b56e981ddcc44349ae6a1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Mark T. Greenberg
2. Russell E. Glasgow
3. Karen M. Emmons

In General Health Professions

1. Karen M. Emmons
2. Russell E. Glasgow
3. L. Green
4. Mark T. Greenberg
5. Taryn Moir

Citations in the corpus

• School‐based prevention: current status and future challenges (2010, background): “Three conceptual models that may assist in guiding research questions include those of the National Implementation Research Network (Fixsen, Naoom, Blase, Friedman, & Wallace, 2005 ), the school ecological model (Greenberg, Domitrovich, Graczyk, & Zins, 2006 ), and the REACH model (Glasgow, Klesge”
• How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed. (2007, background): “views have consistently concluded that data are reported far less often on external validity than on internal validity issues (34, 60, 77).”
• Evaluating the Relevance, Generalization, and Applicability of Research (2006, methodology): “Two levels of alignment are suggested by the RE-AIM model (Glasgow et al., 2004) and by the PRECEDE-PROCEED model (Green & Kreuter, 2005).”