The onset of adult offending: A neglected dimension of the criminal career

By Elaine P. Eggleston, J. Laub. 2002

167 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/18d30571dc119f0df9c7de45a4e1b3553d4e4e42

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Arjan A. J. Blokland
2. C. D. de Poot
3. Paul Nieuwbeerta
4. E. Kleemans

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Paul Nieuwbeerta
2. Arjan A. J. Blokland
3. P. M. Harris
4. C. D. de Poot
5. S. Simpson
6. K. Keller
7. E. Kleemans
8. Alex R. Piquero

Citations in the corpus

• Long-Term Patterns of Offending in Women (2010, background): “Other prospective longitudinal studies included the following: • The Racine birth cohorts (Shannon, 1988, 1991) followed 799 girls and boys from age 6 to age 25 (the 1942 cohort) or age 30 (the 1949 cohort; D’Unger, 2000; Eggleston & Laub, 2002).”
• Criminal Trajectories in Organized Crime (2010, background): “Secondly, almost all research on criminal careers is concerned with high-volume crime, in which adult-onset offending is relatively scarce (but see Eggleston and Laub, 2002).”
• Ex-Offenders Need Not Apply (2005, background): “Fourth, long-term follow-ups of birth cohorts, long the backbone for tracking criminal careers, now find that more than half of adult offenders have no criminal histories whatsoever (Eggleston & Laub, 2002).”
• Understanding Women's Pathways to Jail: Analysing the Lives of Incarcerated Women (2008, background): “Offending onset during adulthood is ignored by theorists and researchers alike (Eggleston & Laub, 2002).”