Implications of Personality Profiles for Batterer Treatment
By Robert J White, E. Gondolf. 2000
142 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Health, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/18be669b7087560c426aa5afe2d2287978564995
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Health
In Social Psychology
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- THEORETICAL AND RESEARCH SUPPORT FOR THE DULUTH MODEL: A REPLY TO DUTTON AND CORVO (2007, methodology): “There is no doubt a diversity of batterer personalities and behavioral patterns, as examinations of personality profiles attest (e.g., Lohr, Bonge, Witte, Hamberger, & Langhinrichsen-Rohling, 2005; White & Gondolf, 2000).”
- Proactive and Reactive Violence among Intimate Partner Violent Men Diagnosed with Antisocial and Borderline Personality Disorder (2009, background): “In reviewing and synthesizing a number of batterer typologies, Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart (1994) outlined a meta-typology of male batterers that has been tested and generally supported (Hamberger et al. 1996; Waltz et al. 2000; White and Gondolf 2000).”
- Evaluating batterer counseling programs: A difficult task showing some effects and implications (2004, methodology): “To explore the utility of batterer types, we created personality-based types in two ways: (1) with a cluster analysis of MCMI-III subscales, and (2) with a classification of the MCMI-III profiles based on interpretative guides (White & Gondolf, 2000).”
- The heterogeneity of spouse abuse: A review (2003, background): “…(Gottman et al 1995; Hamberger et al 1996; Rothschild et al 1997; White and Gondolf 2000: LanghinrichsenRohling et al 2000 and Greene et al 1994) and fail to validate categories using variables associated with domestic violence (Rothschild et al 1997; White and Gondolf 2000 and Greene et al 1994).”