A first look at the Oxford Nanopore MinION sequencer

By Alexander S. Mikheyev, M. Tin. Molecular Ecology Resources, 2014

437 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Ecology, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/18bd7cc631398a2b73dfcddb9c89afef604b0d83

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. Broňa Brejová
2. Tomás Vinar
3. Vladimír Boza
4. J. de Ridder
5. Wigard P. Kloosterman
6. Franka J. Rang

In Ecology

1. Broňa Brejová
2. Tomás Vinar
3. Benedict Paten
4. Vladimír Boza
5. Karen H. Miga

In Molecular Biology

1. Broňa Brejová
2. Tomás Vinar
3. Mark Akeson
4. Benedict Paten
5. Miten Jain
6. Vladimír Boza
7. Karen H. Miga
8. Hugh E. Olsen

Citations in the corpus

• Accurate circular consensus long-read sequencing improves variant detection and assembly of a human genome (2019, neutral): “19,20 .”
• Improved data analysis for the MinION nanopore sequencer (2015, result): “Comparisons with prior results 11,20 demonstrated improved read quality during MAP.”
• DeepNano: Deep recurrent neural networks for base calling in MinION nanopore reads (2016, methodology): “In this paper, we introduce the first open-source base caller for the MinION nanopore sequencing platform (Mikheyev and Tin, 2014).”
• Nanopore-based Fourth-generation DNA Sequencing Technology (2015, background): “Although it has a very high error rate (over 90%), an instrument based on nanopore technology that sequences DNA at the scale of a single molecule is currently available on the market [14].”