A systematic review of randomized trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored education on physical activity and dietary behaviors

By W. Kroeze, A. Werkman, J. Brug. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 2006

596 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. (2007, background): “In addition, narrative reviews of the tailored message literature have consistently remarked that we need to learn a great deal more about the mechanisms underlying effective tailoring and tailored interventions, or the so called “black box” of tailoring (Abrams et al., 1999; Kroeze et al., 2006; Sk”
The Elaboration Likelihood Model of persuasion: Developing health promotions for sustained behavioral change. (2009, background): “For example, one recent review found thirty empirical articles just on computer tailoring (Kroeze, Werkman, and Brug, 2006).”
The Personalization of Conversational Agents in Health Care: Systematic Review (2019, background): “Studies of personalization in health care and medicine have been increasing in number since the early 2000s [22], with growing evidence showing their effectiveness [23-26].”
Computer-tailored health interventions delivered over the Web: review and analysis of key components. (2009, background): “Moreover, recent reviews [22,23] and meta-analyses [24,25] have reported incremental benefits for tailored versus non-tailored interventions in the literature as a whole.”