The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants.

By D. Cochran, D. Buser, C. M. ten Bruggenkate, D. Weingart, T. Taylor, J. Bernard, F. Peters, J. Simpson. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2002

638 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The effects of combined micron-/submicron-scale surface roughness and nanoscale features on cell proliferation and differentiation (2011, background): “increased bone-to-implant contact in vivo [26,27] and improved clinical rates of wound healing [28,29].”
Enhanced Bone Apposition to a Chemically Modified SLA Titanium Surface (2004, positive): “50 mm and acid etched with HCl/H2SO4) used in clinical practice today (Roccuzzo et al., 2001; Cochran et al., 2002; Bornstein et al., 2003).”
Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions. (2017, methodology): “Two of these new microrough surfaces were intensively tested in an early loading protocol after 6–8 weeks of healing up to 5 years of follow up (28, 67, 190).”