Enhanced Bone Apposition to a Chemically Modified SLA Titanium Surface

By Daniel Buser, Nina Broggini, Marco Wieland, Robert K. Schenk, A. Denzer, David L. Cochran, B. Hoffmann, Adrian Lussi, S. G. Steinemann. Journal of dentistry research, 2004

1,213 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Oral Surgery, Orthodontics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6377c5b6ed5d4f7f9972f5fa25b9f6059f975115

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. R. Smeets
2. R. A. Gittens
3. B. Stadlinger
4. F. Schwarz
5. B. Beck-Broichsitter
6. S. Hyzy
7. Ole Jung
8. C. Precht

Citations in the corpus

• A review on the wettability of dental implant surfaces II: Biological and clinical aspects. (2014, background): “domestic pigs, increased bone-to-implant contacts have been observed for clinically relevant, superhydrophilic modBAE surfaces compared to machined surfaces [67] and to hydrophobic BAE controls [42].”
• Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review. (2009, methodology): “Buser et al. (2004) used sandblasted and acid-etched implants and compared with implants that, in addition, had been submerged in NaCl under nitrogen protection before acid etching.”
• Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. (2007, background): “Highly hydrophilic surfaces seem more desirable than hydrophobic ones in view of their interactions with biological fluids, cells and tissues [3,4].”
• Impact of Dental Implant Surface Modifications on Osseointegration (2016, result): “confirmed a higher BIC for SLActive compared to SLA implants 2 and 4 weeks after implant placement but not after 8 weeks, strengthening the theory that hydrophilic surfaces are beneficial in early phases of osseointegration [71].”