Parallel reinforcement learning with linear function approximation
By Matthew Jon Grounds, Daniel Kudenko. 2007
45 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Reinforcement Learning
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Sergey Levine
- Pieter Abbeel
- Yoshua Bengio
- Ruslan Salakhutdinov
- Yuxi Li
- Timothy P. Lillicrap
- Quoc V. Le
- Mohit Bansal
In Reinforcement Learning
- Sergey Levine
- Pieter Abbeel
- Timothy P. Lillicrap
- David Silver
- Shimon Whiteson
- Yuxi Li
- Nicolas Manfred Otto Heess
- R´emi Munos
Citations in the corpus
- Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learning (2016, background): “(Grounds & Kudenko, 2008) proposed a parallel version of the Sarsa algorithm that uses multiple separate actor-learners to accelerate training.”
- Massively Parallel Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learning (2015, background): “Each machine has its own instance of the agent and environment (Grounds & Kudenko, 2008), running a simple reinforcement learning algorithm (linear Sarsa, in this case).”
- Concurrent Reinforcement Learning from Customer Interactions (2013, methodology): “Each time-step has a duration of d; this is typically short and real interactions with each customer are typically sparse.1 We assume that there are a total of N customers; if customers arrive in or exit the system, then their periods of inactivity are represented by null actions.”
- Sharing Experience in Multitask Reinforcement Learning (2019, methodology): “In traditional RL approaches [Sutton and Barto, 1998], such as Q-learning and SARSA, linear approximate functions are used to solve the generalization of machine learning algorithms in infinite and dynamic scenarios [Grounds and Kudenko, 2008; Konidaris et al., 2011].”