Quantifying larval retention and connectivity in marine populations with artificial and natural markers
By S. Thorrold, Geoffrey P. Jones, M. Hellberg, R. Burton, S. Swearer, J. Neigel, S. Morgan, R. R. Warner. 2002
326 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1867325dc9f16e520078bf81eb2dff407ae86976
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Claire B Paris-Limouzy
- R. Cowen
- Jesus Pineda
- J. Leis
- S. Sponaugle
- C. Layman
- I. Nagelkerken
- G. Almany
Citations in the corpus
- Larval dispersal and marine population connectivity. (2009, methodology): “The latter approach is broader taxonomically, but both have the advantage that every individual within the population is marked (see Thorrold et al. 2002, 2007; Hellberg et al. 2002; Planes 2002; Palumbi 2003; Hellberg 2007; Hedgecock et al. 2007).”
- MARINE RESERVES AND OCEAN NEIGHBORHOODS: The Spatial Scale of Marine Populations and Their Management (2004, methodology): “Yet, the same techniques applied to distinguish the elemental signatures of the juvenile section of an otolith can be applied to the section of the otolith laid down in the larval fish as it develops in the plankton (84, 98).”
- Behaviour as input for modelling dispersal of fish larvae: behaviour, biogeography, hydrodynamics, ontogeny, physiology and phylogeny meet hydrography (2007, background): “The latter can use otolith data and physical markers (Thorrold et al. 2002) and some genetic measures (Hellberg et al. 2002).”
- Surfing, spinning, or diving from reef to reef: effects on population connectivity (2007, methodology): “Currently, the spatial scales of the dispersal of reef fish larvae are estimated using indirect and empirical techniques (Thorrold et al. 2002, Jones et al. 2005) or modeling approaches (Cowen et al. 2000, 2006, James et al. 2002).”
- Ontogeny in marine tagging and tracking science: technologies and data gaps (2012, background): “…connectivity in marine fish populations, and understanding these patterns is critical for management of essential fish habitat, understanding vulnerability to climate variability and threats, and the implementation of space-based management tools (Thorrold et al. 2002, Palumbi et al. 2003).”
- Ocean's eleven: a critical evaluation of the role of population, evolutionary and molecular genetics in the management of wild fisheries (2015, background): “However, CMR is difficult to implement for mobile and dispersed marine organisms because of low rates of recapture and tagging-induced mortality (Thorrold et al. 2002).”
- Larval retention and connectivity among populations of corals and reef fishes: history, advances and challenges (2009, background): “…dispersal and population connectivity in the marine environment (see reviews by Kingsford et al. 2002; Warner and Cowen 2002; Strathmann et al. 2002; Swearer et al. 2002; Thorrold et al. 2002; Cowen et al. 2007; Gaines et al. 2007; Jones et al. 2007; Hedgecock et al. 2007; Werner et al. 2007).”
- Spatial and temporal scales of adaptive divergence in marine fishes and the implications for conservation (2006, background): “The tag may be either natural (e.g. a genetic or chemical signature unique to specific parents or sites; Thorrold et al., 2001) or artificial (larvae labelled with a rare chemical; Thorrold et al., 2002).”
- Nursery function of tropical back-reef systems (2006, background): “These measurements result in the truest measure of nursery function, and can be made with research utilizing artificial and natural tags (see Thorrold et al. 1998, 2002, Gillanders et al. 2003, Wetherbee et al. 2004).”
- Predicting self-recruitment in marine populations: biophysical correlates and mechanisms (2002, background): “High parental investment (e.g., reef fishes guarding demersal eggs, Thresher, 1984; external and internal brooding by invertebrates, Levin and Bridges, 1995) should enhance egg, larval and even juvenile survival, as well as enhance self-recruitment by retaining young in the vicinity of the parent…”