CIRCULARITY, RELIABILITY, AND THE COGNITIVE PENETRABILITY OF PERCEPTION

By J. Lyons. 2011

119 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/182caf4193fb9b022ab7d3ecfe97f2164c0b382a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Gary Lupyan
2. Andy Clark
3. Dustin Stokes
4. Lauren L. Emberson
5. Fiona Macpherson
6. Herbert Jaeger
7. Armin W. Geertz
8. Guy Dove

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Andy Clark
2. Dustin Stokes
3. Gary Lupyan
4. Lauren L. Emberson

In Philosophy

1. Dustin Stokes
2. Gary Lupyan
3. Lauren L. Emberson
4. Andy Clark

Citations in the corpus

• Gaining knowledge mediates changes in perception (without differences in attention): A case for perceptual learning (2015, background): “One could always preserve it from falsification by claiming that if any top-down factor influences x (any attribute provisionally taken as truly perceptual) then x does not belong to true “frontend” perception (Lyons 2011).”
• Cognitive Penetrability of Perception (2013, background): “See also Lyons (2011).”
• Cognitive Penetrability of Perception in the Age of Prediction: Predictive Systems are Penetrable Systems (2015, background): “There is considerable interest in penetrability of perception both in philosophy (e.g., Deroy 2013; Lyons 2011; Macpherson 2012; Siegel 2012; Stokes 2011) and psychology (Firestone and Scholl 2014; Goldstone 1995; Hansen et al. 2006; Levin and Banaji 2006; Lupyan and Spivey 2008; Lupyan et al.…”