OPTIMALLY FORAGING MICE MATCH PATCH USE WITH HABITAT DIFFERENCES IN FITNESS

By D. Morris, D. Davidson. 2000

207 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/181aebdfca4da5415c234a7780c0030390c07176

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. P. Munday
2. Mark I. McCormick
3. John L. Orrock
4. R. Bonal
5. K. Schmidt
6. J. A. Moore
7. R. Brinkerhoff
8. M. Díaz

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. K. Schmidt
2. John L. Orrock
3. M. Díaz
4. R. Bonal
5. E. Shochat
6. D. Meikle
7. P. Munday
8. J. Fargallo

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. R. Bonal
2. P. Munday
3. Mark I. McCormick
4. K. Schmidt
5. R. Brinkerhoff
6. M. Díaz
7. E. Shochat
8. J. Viñuela

Citations in the corpus

• Influence of habitat degradation on fish replenishment (2010, background): “…can have a profound effect on its life history, with documented effects on individual growth (Munday 2001; Blondel et al. 2006), body condition (Berumen et al. 2005), reproductive output (Conradt et al. 1999; Morris and Davidson 2000) and probability of survival (Paradis 1995; Burton et al. 2006).”
• How can we apply theories of habitat selection to wildlife conservation and management (2003, background): “Estimates of fitness based on adult survival and recruitment of young born in wooden nest boxes are consistently greater in forest habitat than in either edge or fencerow (Morris 1989, 1991, 19923, 1996b; Morris and Davidson 2000).”
• Effects of vegetation structure and edge habitat on the density and distribution of white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) in small and large forest patches (2003, background): “1999), while others have found fewer mice and lower maternal survival rates and litter success in edge habitats (Morris and Davidson 2000; Wolf and Batzli 2002).”
• INCIDENTAL NEST PREDATION IN SONGBIRDS: BEHAVIORAL INDICATORS DETECT ECOLOGICAL SCALES AND PROCESSES (2001, background): “Although givingup densities are clearly related to quitting harvest rates (e.g., see Kotler and Brown 1990, Morris 1997, Morris and Davidson 2000), less is known about the relationship between the standing crop of resources in the environment and quitting harvest rates.”
• Cattle grazing, raptor abundance and small mammal communities in Mediterranean grasslands (2007, background): “Selection of microsites providing shelter under conditions of increased predation risk is one typical feature of such systems (Morris & Davidson, 2000; Torre & Dı́az, 2004; Dı́az, Torre, Peris, & Tena, 2005).”
• Rodent foraging is affected by indirect, but not by direct, cues of predation risk (2004, background): “…risk if everything else experienced by the forager among treatments can be assumed to be equal (Brown, 1988) and has been used to quantify predation risk experienced by rodents (see Bouskila, 1995; Herman and Valone, 2000; Kotler et al., 1991; Morris and Davidson, 2000; Thorson et al., 1998).”
• Toward an ecological synthesis: a case for habitat selection (2003, background): “Fretwell 1972), interspecific interactions (Rosenzweig 1974, 1979, 1981; Morris 1988, 1989, 1999a; Danielson 1992), resource distributions (Pulliam and Caraco 1974; Sutherland 1983; Fagen 1987; Morris 1994; Morris and Knight 1996; Morris and Davidson 2000), spatial scale (Pulliam 1988; Pulliam and D”
• Ecological traps in isodars: effects of tallgrass prairie management on bird nest success (2005, background): “The importance of gathering data on any component of fitness (e.g. energy gain or reproductive output) in addition to measuring densities has been demonstrated in the past (Morris and Davidson 2000, Shochat et al. 2002).”