Synchrony: a neuronal mechanism for attentional selection?

167 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

On the Binding Problem in Artificial Neural Networks (2020, background): “data in support of this interpretation relating synchronized oscillatory behavior of individual neurons to perceptual grouping (Usher and Donnelly, 1998; Tallon-Baudry and Bertrand, 1999), attention (Niebur et al., 2002), and sensory-motor integration (Pesce Ibarra, 2017; Engel and Fries, 2010; see ”
Predictive Feedback Can Account for Biphasic Responses in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus (2009, background): “This view has received increasing attention over the past years [83–85] as more data is becoming available suggesting that spike timing may be important for neural communication [86–89].”
Pathophysiology of Migraine: A Disorder of Sensory Processing. (2017, background): “While the term excitability is often used to characterize these responses, a state of hypersynchrony (49, 627) would explain the clinical symptoms of migraine very well.”
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF MIGRAINE (2006, background): “If migraine were basically an ‘‘attentional’’ sensory problem with changes in cortical synchronization (Niebur et al, 2002), hypersynchronization (Angelini et al, 2004), all its manifestations could be accounted for in a single overarching pathophysiological hypothesis of a disturbance of…”