The role of inhibition in meaning selection: Insights from retrieval-induced forgetting.

By Geeta Shivde, Michael C. Anderson. 2001

95 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Theoretical issues in inhibition: Insights from research on human memory. (2007, background): “Similarly, doing retrieval practice on the meanings of asymmetric homographs results in significant impairment for the dominant meaning, but not for the subordinate meaning (Shivde & Anderson, 2001).”
When does Retrieval Induce Forgetting and When does it Induce Facilitation? Implications for Retrieval Inhibition, Testing Effect, and Text Processing (2009, methodology): “Multiple retrieval practice attempts are frequently employed in the design of RIFO experiments, although there is evidence that increasing the number of retrieval practice trials does not necessarily translate to a larger RIFO effect (Macrae & MacLeod, 1999; Shivde & Anderson, 2001).”
Rethinking interference theory: Executive control and the mechanisms of forgetting. (2003, methodology): “Parallel findings have been observed in episodic memory experiments using homographs, which establish that inhibitory effects are recall specific, consistent with properties of retrieval-induced forgetting more generally (Shivde & Anderson, 2001).”
Rethinking inhibition theory: On the problematic status of the inhibition theory for forgetting (2013, methodology): “This is most clearly illustrated by a consideration of the experiments of Shivde and Anderson (2001).”