Preferred reporting items of systematic review and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

By David Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, Douglas G. Altman. 2011

9,074 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1726b58bb2651fc7d21c2a36f22eeaaa16092a36

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses (2019, background): “As with all research, the value of a systematic review depends on rigorous methods and the clarity of reporting, as well as on the application of scientific strategies so that possible errors and biases are limited (Moher et al., 2009).”
Electricity load forecasting: a systematic review (2020, methodology): “The Preferred-Reporting Items for Systematic-Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) flow diagram was adopted for this study based on its ability to advance the value and quality of the systematic review as compared with other guidelines [16, 25, 26].”
Neuropsychological testing of cognitive impairment in euthymic bipolar disorder: an individual patient data meta‐analysis (2013, background): “Search strategy Given the existence of five recent prior reviews in this area (each with similar but different search terms and inclusion/exclusion criteria), this study did not conduct an additional full systematic search under PRISMA (24) rules.”
Association Between Fibrosis Stage and Outcomes of Patients with Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (2020, methodology): “accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement.(11) The review”
Online Dating and Problematic Use: A Systematic Review (2020, methodology): “Method An extensive literature search in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement (PRISMA) (Moher et al. 2009) was conducted in May 2019 using the Web of Science and PsycINFO databases.”
Influences of the Industry 4.0 Revolution on the Human Capital Development and Consumer Behavior: A Systematic Review (2020, background): “org/), being prepared following the points in the report for systematic reviews and meta-analyses [41,42].”
A Systematic Review of IoT Solutions for Smart Farming (2020, methodology): “To reach the proposed objectives, this study has used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) methodology, which is a framework developed to support reports and systematic reviews of literature [52].”
A Review of Nontraditional Teaching Methods: Flipped Classroom, Gamification, Case Study, Self-Learning, and Social Media (2019, unknown): “The approach adopted for this study’s literature review was similar to those of previous literature reviews in the area of education in engineering [91,92].”
Green Human Resource Management: An Evidence-Based Systematic Literature Review (2020, methodology): “The paper selection process was conducted in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement [37].”
The prevalence of mental illness in refugees and asylum seekers: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020, methodology): “S1 Prisma Checklist.”