Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses
By M. Linnenluecke, Mauricio Marrone, Abhay K. Singh. Australian Journal of Management, 2019
1,379 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Literature reviews play an essential role in academic research to gather existing knowledge and to examine the state of a field. However, researchers in business, management and related disciplines continue to rely on cursory and narrative reviews that lack a systematic investigation of the literature. This article details methodological steps for conducting literature reviews in a replicable and scientific fashion. This article also discusses bibliographic mapping approaches to visualise bibliometric information and findings from a systematic literature review. We hope that the insights provided in this article are useful for researchers at different stages of their careers – ranging from doctoral students who wish to assemble a broad overview of their field of interest to guide their work, to senior researchers who wish to publish authoritative literature reviews. JEL Classification: C18, C80, C88, M10, M20
Subfields: Statistics and Probability, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fe9cd653be2f3fc9ee31718e07c439387aa83585
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistics and Probability
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research (2021, background): “A systematic review can therefore be useful as a precursor of most primary research to assess the state of the field before adding to it (Linnenluecke et al., 2020; Rojon et al., 2011).”
- Mapping Scientific Knowledge in Systematic Literature Reviews Through Embeddings and Bibliometric Techniques (2026, unknown): “Bibliometrics enhances understanding of trends and emerging directions [13], [18].”