Concerns about reputation via gossip promote generous allocations in an economic game

By Jared Piazza, Jesse M. Bering. 2008

174 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/171af7f2d3d310f91e175735440382ed8740d910

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Daniel Balliet
2. P. V. van Lange
3. E. Smith
4. Junhui Wu
5. Joseph Henrich

In Safety Research

1. P. V. van Lange
2. Junhui Wu
3. Daniel Balliet
4. E. Smith
5. Tom Lane
6. Bogdan Wojciszke

In Sociology and Political Science

1. P. V. van Lange
2. Daniel Balliet
3. Junhui Wu
4. E. Smith
5. Tom Lane
6. Bogdan Wojciszke
7. J. Joireman
8. Joseph Henrich

Citations in the corpus

• Reputation management: Why and how gossip enhances generosity (2016, background): “Indeed, people act more cooperatively when their behavior affects reputation (Griskevicius et al., 2010; Van Vugt & Hardy, 2010), or when their partner would gossip (Beersma & Van Kleef, 2011; Piazza & Bering, 2008).”
• Moral Reputation: An Evolutionary and Cognitive Perspective (2012, unknown): “…2006; Hoffman, McCabe, & Smith, 1996; Kurzban, 2001; Kurzban, DeScioli, & O’Brien, 2006; Mifune, Hashimoto, & Yamagishi, 2010; Milinski et al., 2002; Piazza & Bering, 2008a, 2008b; Rigdon, Ishii, Watabe, & Kitayama, 2009; Van Vugt & Hardy, 2010). self-interested, this has been taken as strong…”
• Reputation, Gossip, and Human Cooperation (2016, background): “Other forms of cooperation, such as altruistic punishment of norm violators, are also promoted by the presence of observers (Kurzban, DeScioli, & O’Brien, 2007; Piazza & Bering, 2008b).”
• Communication and collective action: language and the evolution of human cooperation (2010, background): “Piazza and Bering (2008) used an experimental variation that mimicked gossiping in social networks, running anonymous one-shot dictator games in which recipients could inform third parties how much the allocator had shared.”