The impact of program developers as evaluators on criminal recidivism: Results from meta-analyses of experimental and quasi-experimental research

171 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The impact of trial stage, developer involvement and international transferability on universal social and emotional learning programme outcomes: a meta-analysis (2016, result): “This result is at odds with findings from allied disciplines such as psychiatry (Perlis et al. (2005), and criminology (Petrosino & Soydan, 2005), which demonstrate clear difference in effect when considering developer involvement.”
Sources of Variability in Estimates of Predictive Validity (2011, background): “The same issue has been explored in some detail in regard to effective correctional treatment by at least three groups of researchers (Andrews & Dowden, 2005; Lipsey, 2009; Petrosino & Soydan, 2005).”
Restorative Justice Conferencing (RJC) Using Face‐to‐Face Meetings of Offenders and Victims: Effects on Offender Recidivism and Victim Satisfaction. A Systematic Review (2013, background): “Petrosino and Soydan (2005) and Eisner (2009) have both suggested that there is an effect in which evaluations associated with people who develop programs are likely to show better outcomes than evaluations in which no developer is a collaborator.”
The effects of sexual offender treatment on recidivism: an international meta-analysis of sound quality evaluations (2015, result): “The finding that only evaluations by authors affiliated to the program is in accordance with other criminological findings (Eisner, 2009; Petrosino & Soydan, 2005).”