The rhetoric of fiction

By W. Booth. 2000

2,329 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/16aa780822cee9af835c4778786aa743b8745634

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Philosophy

Citations in the corpus

When consumers and brands talk: Storytelling theory and research in psychology and marketing (2008, background): “In pure dramas, the actions and the characters simply unfold in the storytelling, and the expectation is that the readers, viewers, or listeners provide their own interpretations (Boller, 1990; Booth, 1961; Iser, 1976; Martin, 1986).”
A Bayesian Mixed Effects Model of Literary Character (2014, background): “For instance, representation of character is notoriously complicated by narrative point of view (Booth, 1961); and indeed, comparisons between first-person narrators and other characters are a primary source of error for all models tested above.”
Metarepresentation in linguistic communication (2000, neutral): “" (Booth 1961: 252).”
Disciplinary Literacies and Learning to Read for Understanding: A Conceptual Framework for Disciplinary Literacy (2016, background): “…interpretation involves problems of point of view, including who is talking, whose point of view is being represented, and is the narrator reliable (Booth, 1983); problems of figuration, including symbolism, irony, and satire (Booth, 1974; Ogborn & Buckroyd, 2001; Peskin et al., 2010); and…”
COGNITIVE MODELS OF WRITING: WRITING PROFICIENCY AS A COMPLEX INTEGRATED SKILL (2008, neutral): “…we will not review it exhaustively here (but see Abbott, 2002; Adams, 1996; Applebee, 1978; Bal, 2004; Barthes & Duisit, 1975/1966; Bonheim, 1982; Booth, 1961; Bortolussi & Dixon, 2003, Brooks, 1984; Cortazzi, 1993; Culler, 1975; Emmott, 1997; Fleischmann, 1990; Fowler, 1977; D. Herman, 2002; L.…”