A new conceptual and methodological framework for exploring and explaining pattern in presence – absence data

By János Podani, Dénes Schmera. 2011

476 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1698f0ab240fbe0a06fc0787c3f78c8db3c58d12

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

The relationship between species replacement, dissimilarity derived from nestedness, and nestedness (2012, background): “The first contribution (Podani & Schmera, 2011, hereafter referred to as PS for brevity), argues for a new approach to combine several measures of beta diversity, nestedness and richness differences.”
Revealing a conservation challenge through partitioned long‐term beta diversity: increasing turnover and decreasing nestedness of boreal lake metacommunities (2013, unknown): “Baselga’s (2012) review has shown that other recent partitioning methods (Podani & Schmera, 2011; Carvalho et al., 2012) also have problems.”
Structure and dynamics of core/periphery networks (2013, background): “Podani & Schmera [87] underlined that NODF (in contrast to PRN or PRSN) depends on the ordering of columns in the data matrix.”
Comparing methods to separate components of beta diversity (2015, methodology): “…component quantifies differences in species richness between assemblages nested to some degree (Baselga 2010b, 2012), the richness-difference component quantifies any difference in richness, irrespective of assemblages being nested or not (Podani & Schmera 2011; Carvalho, Cardoso & Gomes 2012).”
On the meanings of nestedness: back to the basics (2012, methodology): “Podani and Schmera (2011) tried to link species turnover (b-diversity) as measured by Simpson and similar overlap metrics with nested subset patterns.”
Invertebrate assemblage responses and the dual roles of resistance and resilience to drying in intermittent rivers (2016, methodology): “This procedure produced a variable (RichDiff) standardised by river-level richness and comparable across the dataset (Podani and Schmera 2011).”
BAT – Biodiversity Assessment Tools, an R package for the measurement and estimation of alpha and beta taxon, phylogenetic and functional diversity (2015, background): “How to partition these different components has been a field of much recent development (Baselga 2010, 2012; Podani & Schmera 2011; Carvalho, Cardoso & Gomes 2012; Carvalho et al. 2013; Legendre 2014), including when phylogenetic or functional relations between species are taken into account…”
A general framework for analyzing beta diversity, nestedness and related community-level phenomena based on abundance data (2013, methodology): “On the analogy of the presence/absence version (Podani and Schmera, 2011) this is called the relativized strict nestedness function.”
What drives study‐dependent differences in distance–decay relationships of microbial communities? (2021, methodology): “To combat this, modified versions of classic indices, such as Jaccard, Sørensen and Bray– Curtis, have been developed, allowing the partitioning of community similarity metrics into their turnover and nestedness components (Baselga, 2010; Podani & Schmera, 2011).”
Statistical challenges in null model analysis (2012, background): “These multiple structured matrices do not fit into any simple static classification scheme and may require a multivariate approach to pattern description (Podani and Schmera 2011).”
Beta diversity of diatom species and ecological guilds: Response to environmental and spatial mechanisms along the stream watercourse (2018, methodology): “Despite some criticism (Carvalho, Cardoso, & Gomes, 2012; Podani & Schmera, 2011), Baselga’s (2010) approach has been successfully implemented to account for spatial (Viana et al., 2016), climatic (Dobrovolski, Melo, Cassemiro, & Diniz-Filho, 2012; Hortal et al., 2011; Svenning, Fløjgaard, &…”
A meta‐analysis of nestedness and turnover components of beta diversity across organisms and ecosystems (2018, methodology): “We found, however, that the turnover component of Podani and Schmera (2011) showed a very high correlation (r5 .915) with the Baselga (2010) metric, whereas nestedness and richness differences had clearly a lower correlation (r5 .581; Supporting Information Appendix S1).”
Interpreting the replacement and richness difference components of beta diversity (2014, methodology): “This is also the concept that underlies the nestedness indices of Podani & Schmera (2011).”