What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design
By P. Verbeek. 2005
1,249 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Cognitive Neuroscience, History and Philosophy of Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1679de6fc4a38f83650241edb6d78fea73c698a9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
In Cognitive Neuroscience
In History and Philosophy of Science
Citations in the corpus
- Embodied cognition and the magical future of interaction design (2013, background): “This view moves us beyond Gibsonian exegesis to a more enactive paradigm [Varela et al. 1991].”
- Beyond the user: use and non-use in HCI (2009, neutral): “The idea of technological experience as inherently inauthentic has a long and problematic history (Verbeek 2005) but it is also suggestive of a particular line of analysis.”
- PowerPoint, habits of mind, and classroom culture (2006, background): “They suggest that ‘informed’ teachers are always in a position to repurpose or even subvert a digital technology’s ‘implicit users manual’ (Verbeek 2005) to suit their local pedagogical intentions.”
- Re-inventing invention: new tendencies in capitalist commodification (2006, background): “In a sense, the aim is simply to see the thing itself, to see things as they ‘merely’ are, through a material aesthetics (Verbeek 2005) that allows objects to be turned into ‘poetics’.”
- Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design (2010, background): “Material ecology theory emphasizes the extent to which an artifact participates in a system of artifacts [73, 52].”
- Designing behavior in interaction : using aesthetic experience as a mechanism for design (2010, background): “The work of Verbeek (2005) on Technological Mediation shows that the way a device behaves influences a person’s response to it.”
- Pay-per-use business models as a driver for sustainable consumption: Evidence from the case of HOMIE (2018, background): “A third approach to study sustainable consumption is from the field of Philosophy of Technology (Verbeek, 2005), in which the impact of technology on human beings is the main focus.”