Market structure and entry: Where’s the beef?
By O. Toivanen, M. Waterson. 2001
193 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/16790346a65ce2521a0cb2049f65ca6846460b02
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Liran Einav
- Katja Seim
- Martin Pesendorfer
- Charles C. Moul
- Mirva Peltoniemi
- Harikesh S. Nair
- Thomas G. Wollmann
- Philipp Schmidt-Dengler
Citations in the corpus
- NOT ALL RIVALS LOOK ALIKE: ESTIMATING AN EQUILIBRIUM MODEL OF THE RELEASE DATE TIMING GAME (2010, background): “For example, the historical order of entry as in Toivanen and Waterson (2005), or the sequence of initial release date announcements in the current context, often allows the data to provide a natural order.”
- Distance, Bank Heterogeneity and Entry in Local Banking Markets (2008, unknown): “As observed by Toivanen and Waterson (2001), the inclusion of incumbents in the pool of potential entrants would be at odds with the presence of entry sunk costs.”
- An empirical model of firm entry with endogenous product-type choices (2006, background): “Examples include differences in firms’ cost structures 1Related work in this area includes Ellickson (2003), Stavins (1995), and Toivanen and Waterson (2001b).”