The Clean Development Mechanism and the International Diffusion of Technologies: An Empirical Study
By Antoine Dechezleprêtre, M. Glachant, Yann Ménière. 2008
315 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1675645445f374bc853a71869e6f6324da7575b1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Muhammad Shahbaz
- Antoine Dechezleprêtre
- David Popp
- Jun Xiang
- Kyle S. Herman
- M. Glachant
- Khalid Ahmed
- Yann Ménière
Citations in the corpus
- Technology transfer in the clean development mechanism: Insights from wind power (2013, background): “This is an important insight with respect to the discussion about whether stronger local capabilities render technology transfer less relevant (Dechezlepretre et al., 2008; Doranova et al., 2010).”
- Technology transfer by CDM projects: A comparison of Brazil, China, India and Mexico (2009, methodology): “We use the same data and similar econometric models to explain inter-country differences.”
- Induced innovation in clean energy technologies from foreign environmental policy stringency? (2019, background): “This approach rests on the strong assumption that environmental technologies are indeed actively traded across borders and that their innovative development is globally dispersed (Dechezleprêtre et al., 2008; Dechezleprêtre et al., 2011).”
- Innovation and Climate Policy (2010, background): “Dechezleprêtre et al. (2008) provide evidence of the potential of CDM to provide such benefits, asking how many CDM projects 10 Note that developing countries can be compensated for future cost increases, so that CDM projects become mutually beneficial.”
- The emission cost of international sourcing: using structural decomposition analysis to calculate the contribution of international sourcing to CO2-emission growth (2016, background): “Instead, our analysis and results call for an alternative strategy to cope with the consequences in terms of emissions of increasing wage cost-driven international sourcing: reducing the carbon intensity of the energy infrastructure in low-wage countries through, e.g. the Clean Development Mechanism”
- Trade openness–carbon emissions nexus: The importance of turning points of trade openness for country panels (2016, methodology): “…(i.e. the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) and the Joint implementation (JI) under the Kyoto Protocol) provide an emission-reduction strategy through an international technology diffusion from industrialized to industrializing countries (Youngman et al., 2007; Dechezleprêtre et al., 2008).”