Foraging flight distances as a measure of parental effort in blue tits Parus caeruleus differ with environmental conditions

By Michael J. Stauss, J. F. Burkhardt, J. Tomiuk. 2005

105 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1671a0cff8f1c59f73054d5f296778d9d19052a5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Andrew K. Wilson
2. C. Lindell
3. J. Speakman
4. Paul Bellamy
5. Shelley A. Hinsley
6. N. Harrison
7. P. Ferns
8. Ross A. Hill

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. C. Lindell
2. J. Speakman
3. N. Harrison
4. P. Ferns

Citations in the corpus

• Effects of structural and functional habitat gaps on breeding woodland birds: working harder for less (2008, methodology): “A study of foraging distances in blue tits in Germany (Stauss et al. 2005), again found shorter foraging distances in high quality habitat (deciduous woodland, 22 m) compared with low quality habitat (mixed woodland, 40 m).”
• The Value of Animal Behavior in Evaluations of Restoration Success (2008, background): “The number of provisioning trips parents could make in the poor-quality habitat reached an asymptote and limited the number of fledglings produced per brood below that of the high-quality habitat (Stauss et al. 2005).”