An Observed Connection between the North Atlantic Oscillation and the Madden-Julian Oscillation

By Hai Lin, Gilbert Brunet, J. Derome. 2009

346 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/164d7954aae22e00e54cab1d9a8c7504e2ed9eb3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

1. Chidong Zhang
2. E. Maloney
3. M. Wheeler
4. Daehyun Kim
5. K. Straub
6. Hai Lin
7. Duane Waliser
8. Á. Adames

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Chidong Zhang
2. E. Maloney
3. M. Wheeler
4. Daehyun Kim
5. Duane Waliser
6. K. Straub
7. Hai Lin
8. Á. Adames

In Oceanography

1. Chidong Zhang
2. M. Wheeler
3. E. Maloney
4. K. Straub
5. Wanqiu Wang
6. H. Hendon
7. Xiouhua Fu
8. Xianan Jiang

Citations in the corpus

• The quiet revolution of numerical weather prediction (2015, background): “…for tropical cyclones 56 or weather regimes 57 , and for the evaluation of how well models represent the links between lower and higher latitudes 58,59 , troposphere and stratosphere 60,61 , planetary wave activity driving syn-optic scale features 62 , and synoptic scales interacting with…”
• Review of Tropical‐Extratropical Teleconnections on Intraseasonal Time Scales (2017, background): “Forecasting Tropical-Extratropical Interactions The time-lagged connection of the NAO to the MJO observed by Cassou (2008) and Lin et al. (2009) implies that part of the NAO subseasonal variability is generated by tropical forcing associated with MJO, so that knowing the initial state of the…”
• Collaboration of the Weather and Climate Communities to Advance Subseasonal-to-Seasonal Prediction (2010, methodology): “For example, Lin et al. (2009) show a two-way connection between the NAO and the MJO (see Table 1).”
• SEAS5: the new ECMWF seasonal forecast system (2018, background): “Since links between Indian Ocean rainfall and the NAO are also evident on the sub-seasonal timescale (Cassou, 2008; Lin et al., 2009), future analysis of SEAS5 performance in reproducing tropical intra-seasonal variability (such as the Madden–Julian Oscillation) and the associated ocean–atmosphere…”
• MJO simulation in CMIP5 climate models: MJO skill metrics and process-oriented diagnosis (2017, neutral): “…al. 1990; Berbery and Nogués-Paegle 1993; Higgins and Mo 1997; Matthews et al. 2004; Vecchi and Bond 2004; Cassou 2008; L’Heureux and Higgins 2008; Lin et al. 2009; Johnson and Feldstein 2010; Seo and Son 2011; Garfinkel et al. 2012; Guan et al. 2012; Yoo et al. 2012; Henderson et al. 2016;…”
• A Comparison of OLR and Circulation-Based Indices for Tracking the MJO (2014, methodology): “This particular index has become standard formonitoring the state of theMJO in real time and inmodels (Lin et al. 2009; Gottschalck et al. 2010; Rashid et al. 2011; Hamill and Kiladis 2014).”
• Stratospheric control of the Madden-Julian oscillation. (2017, background): “However, unlike the ENSO, the impacts of the QBO onMJO activity and the related teleconnections have not been well documented until very recently (Liu et al. 2014; Yoo and Son 2016; Marshall et al. 2016; Nishimoto and Yoden 2017).”
• MJO prediction in the NCEP Climate Forecast System version 2 (2014, background): “One climate variability mode offering enhanced prospects for improved intraseasonal climate prediction is the Madden–Julian Oscillation (MJO, Madden and Julian 1971, 1972) which is associated with the interaction between convection and large-scale circulation in the tropics and propagates eastward…”
• Atmosphere‐ocean coupled processes in the Madden‐Julian oscillation (2015, background): “…linked to floods and landslides; interactions with the polar Southern [Matthews and Meredith, 2004] and Northern Annular Modes and cold air outbreaks over Europe [Zhou and Miller, 2005; Cassou, 2008; Lin et al., 2009; Vitart and Molteni, 2010]; and Arctic sea ice extent [Henderson et al., 2014].”
• The DOE E3SM Coupled Model Version 1: Description and Results at High Resolution (2019, background): “The MJO has broad reaching impacts through various teleconnections, including North American temperature and precipitation (e.g., Donald et al., 2006; Lin et al., 2009).”
• The impact of the MJO on clusters of wintertime circulation anomalies over the North American region (2012, background): “Consistent with previous results (e.g., Cassou 2008; L’Heureux and Higgins 2008; and Lin et al. 2009), Cluster 4 probabilities are elevated approximately 10-20 days after an MJO event in phase 7.”
• Observed connection between stratospheric sudden warmings and the Madden‐Julian Oscillation (2012, neutral): “Previous studies on the MJO/NAO connection [e.g., Cassou , 2008; L ’ Heureux and Higgins , 2008; Lin et al. , 2009] examined lead times up to 2 weeks, presumably assuming that the MJO-excited pole-ward propagating Rossby waves are confined to the tropo-sphere.”
• Fifty Years of Research on the Madden‐Julian Oscillation: Recent Progress, Challenges, and Perspectives (2020, methodology): “The analysis procedure is the same as that described in H. Lin et al. (2009), except that data of 40 winters (1979/1980–2018/2019) are used here compared to 25 years (1979/1980–2003/2004) in the previous study.”