Scale economies in electricity distribution: a semiparametric analysis

144 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Strategic behaviour under regulatory benchmarking (2004, background): “10 See Filippini (1996, 1997, 1998) and Filippini and Wild (1998) for studies of Switzerland; Salvanes and Tjotta (1994, 1998) for Norway; Giles and Wyatt (1993) for New Zealand; and Yatchew (2000) for Canada.”
The Capital-Energy Controversy: An Artifact of Cost Shares? (2002, background): “…in the last six years (1996-2001), more than 100 contributions to the literature can be found (Econlit) utilizing, or at least mentioning, the translog cost function approach, with Kumbhakar (1997), Yatchew (2000), Ryan and Wales (2000), and Thomsen (2000) being the most important articles.”
Scope and scale economies in multi-utilities: evidence from gas, water and electricity combinations (2004, methodology): “This paper departs from Sing (1987) and Yatchew (2000) and applies the Composite specification that was first introduced by Pulley and Braunstein (1992).”
Productive efficiency and regulatory reform: The case of vehicle inspection services (2006, unknown): “Several authors have used this methodology (or related techniques) to study productive efficiency in other regulated sectors ‐ for instance Resende (2000) in telecommunications, Yatchew (2000) in electricity, and Affuso et al. (2002) and Kennedy and Smith (2004) in railways.”
Difference-based ridge estimator of parameters in partial linear model (2010, methodology): “3 to the analysis of data generated by Yatchew (2000) .”