Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches

By Atlanta Sloane-Seale. 2009

2,536 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1626b2402381834e6a90b4cc01327ffbed16ceec

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Richard K. Ladyshewsky
2. Steve M. Easterbrook
3. Margaret-Anne D. Storey
4. Daniela E. Damian
5. Janice Singer

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Richard K. Ladyshewsky
2. Steve M. Easterbrook
3. Margaret-Anne D. Storey
4. Daniela E. Damian
5. Janice Singer

Citations in the corpus

• A Review of the Quality Indicators of Rigor in Qualitative Research (2019, neutral): “Review of this audit trail occurs prior to manuscript development and enhances study confirmability.(1,16) The peer reviewer offers a critique of the study methods and validation of the conclusions drawn by the author as a thorough check on researcher bias.”
• Selecting Empirical Methods for Software Engineering Research (2008, methodology): “In this chapter we characterize four dominant philosophical stances (Creswell, 2002).”
• The manager as coach as a driver of organizational development (2010, methodology): “The investigator must also „bracket‟ or be aware of their own personal biases that may influence data analysis (Creswell, 2003).”