ABIOTIC VS. BIOTIC INFLUENCES ON HABITAT SELECTION OF COEXISTING SPECIES: CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS?

By T. E. Martin. 2001

227 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1617b2ec7436d6fc615525540a0cf52e4d855e54

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

ECOLOGICAL AND FITNESS CONSEQUENCES OF SPECIES COEXISTENCE: A REMOVAL EXPERIMENT WITH WOOD WARBLERS (2001, methodology): “…material out of their bills), as well as general aggression of Orange-crowned Warblers towards Virginia’s early in the breeding season (Martin and Martin 2001), support the hypothesis that Orange-crowned Warblers may exclude Virginia’s from preferred nest sites through direct aggressive…”
Predicting the Geography of Species’ Invasions via Ecological Niche Modeling (2003, background): “... now been tested further based on diverse examples, including plants, insects, molluscs, and vertebrates, terrestrial and aquatic systems, apart from the broad literature that presents examples in which climate-matching approaches in general provided good predictivity of geographic invasive poten”
Social thermoregulation exerts more influence than microclimate on forest roost preferences by a cavity-dwelling bat (2007, background): “Microclimate has commonly been suggested as a criterion underlying the preferences of endotherms for some nest or roost sites over others and has been linked to habitat preferences in many species (e.g., Entwistle et al. 1997; Nelson and Martin 1999; Martin 2001; Sedgeley 2001; Wiebe 2001; Russell”
Ecological and life-history traits explain recent boundary shifts in elevation and latitude of western North American songbirds (2014, background): “…responses that mitigate the effects of climate change in situ such as changes in phenology (Parmesan & Yohe, 2003), shifts in microhabitat use (Martin, 2001) as well as evolutionary adaptation (Parmesan, 2006), may also explain why the range margins of some species are shifting less, not at…”
Predators and the breeding bird: behavioral and reproductive flexibility under the risk of predation (2009, background): “It is reasonable to expect then that the presence of ‘‘density-dependent’’ predators will drive increased spacing of nests, especially with respect to those of conspecifics and other species with similar nesting requirements (see also Martin & Martin, 2001).”
Mechanisms and fitness effects of interspecific information use between migrant and resident birds (2007, background): “…and the risk of predation that affects the reproductive success of individuals (Robinson et al. 1995; Sinervo and DeNardo 1996; Forsman, Mönkkönen, Helle, and Inkeröinen 1998; Martin 2001; Thomson, Forsman, Mönkkönen, et al. 2006; Thomson, Forsman, Sardà-Palomera, and Mönkkönen 2006).”
The role of climate in limiting European resident bird populations (2003, unknown): “Interspecific interactions are involved when individuals of different species are making trade-offs between food and predation risk (Suhonen, 1993) or when climate-associated shifts in nest-site selection bring about costs in terms of increased nest predation (Martin, 2001).”
Competitor density cues for habitat quality facilitating habitat selection and investment decisions (2008, background): “…quality of habitats, such as the amount and quality of food resources, intensity of predation and competition, and microclimate conditions (e.g., Gustafsson 1987; Robinson et al. 1995; Sinervo and DeNardo 1996; Forsman et al. 1998; Martin 2001; Shima and Osenberg 2003; Marshall and Cooper 2004).”
Breeding Dates and Reproductive Performance (2004, background): “For example, Martin (2001) found that changes in precipitation lead to shifts in microhabitat use by orange-crowned (Vermivora celata) and Virginia’s (V. virginiae) warblers primarily because orange-crowned warblers dominate Virginia’s warbler and limit their use of some microhabitats.”
Nest-site preference and maternal effects on offspring growth (2004, background): “Yet a wide variety of environmental factors may exert selection on preferences (Werner et al., 1983; Lima and Dill, 1990; Martin, 2001 ).”