Mechanisms and fitness effects of interspecific information use between migrant and resident birds

84 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Predators and the breeding bird: behavioral and reproductive flexibility under the risk of predation (2009, background): “…a substantial reproductive advantage; the precise mechanism underlying this advantage was not identified (see also Seppänen, Mönkkönen & Forsman, 2005; Forsman et al., 2007), but heterospecific neighbours are frequent mobbing partners during encounters with predators (Forsman & Mönkkönen,…”
Antipredator calls of tufted titmice and interspecific transfer of encoded threat information (2012, background): “Moreover, enhanced reproductive success may accrue to heterospecifics that nest in close proximity to parid nests (Forsman et al. 2002, 2007).”
Research Needs and Recommendations for the use of Conspecific-Attraction Methods in the Conservation of Migratory Songbirds (2010, background): “In some cases, the songs of other species could be interpreted as the presence of competitors (Mönkkönen et al. 1999, Thomson et al. 2003, Forsman et al. 2007, Fletcher 2008).”
Competitor density cues for habitat quality facilitating habitat selection and investment decisions (2008, background): “First, it clearly affects settlement order of habitat patches and distribution and density of individuals in the landscape (Mönkkönen et al. 1990; Forsman et al. 1998, 2002, 2007; Thomson et al. 2003; Parejo et al. 2005; Fletcher 2007, this study).”