The Kodaira dimension of moduli spaces of curves with marked points

By Adam Logan. 2001

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The purpose of this paper is to generalize the methods and results due to Eisenbud, Harris, and Mumford on the moduli space of curves of genus g to the moduli space of curves of genus g with n marked points. The main result is the determination, for each g with 4 ≤ g ≤ 23, of an n such that the moduli space is of general type. 1. Introduction. In the early 1980s, Eisenbud, Harris, and Mumford stud- ied Mg, the moduli space of curves of a given genus, and succeeded in proving that if the genus is at least 24, the moduli space is of general type. This was contrary to many people's expectations, as it had been known for some time that moduli spaces of curves of small genus were rational or unirational. Briefly, what is involved in their proof is the computation of the canonical divisor of Mg, the exhibition of certain effective divisors and the determination of their classes, and the verification that the canonical divisor is the sum of an ample and an effective divisor. In the other direction, it is known that Mg has Kodaira dimension −∞ when g ≤ 13 or g = 15. One can generalize the definition of Mg by asking for a parametrization of the curves of genus g together with n distinct nonsingular points on them. This amounts to studying, instead of families of curves, families of curves with n disjoint sections. As before, it turns out that one obtains a noncompact moduli space, which is compactified by replacing "nonsingular curve" by "stable curve" in the definitions. In order to be considered stable, an n-pointed curve is required only to have finitely many automorphisms that fix all the marked points. The space can still be compact even when the marked points are required to be distinct and nonsingular, because coincident or singular marked points can be blown up on the total space of the family.

Subfields: Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/160ffb757689c37e2d44ca029f0b3d2c89760814

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Geometry and Topology

  1. Ingrid Bauer
  2. F. Catanese
  3. Dawei Chen
  4. A. Verra
  5. Martin Moeller
  6. Maksym Fedorchuk
  7. G. Farkas
  8. D. Smyth

In Mathematical Physics

  1. Ingrid Bauer
  2. Dawei Chen
  3. F. Catanese
  4. Martin Moeller
  5. A. Verra
  6. Maksym Fedorchuk
  7. D. Smyth
  8. G. Farkas

Citations in the corpus