Scaling Relations of Spiral Galaxies

By S. Courteau, A. Dutton, Frank C. van den Bosch, L. MacArthur, A. Dekel, D. H. Mcintosh, D. Dale. 2007

187 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We construct a large data set of global structural parameters for 1300 field and cluster spiral galaxies and explore the joint distribution of luminosity L, optical rotation velocity V, and disk size R at I and 2MASS K bands. The I- and K-band velocity-luminosity (VL) relations have log slopes of 0.29 and 0.27, respectively, with σln(VL) ~ 0.13, and show a small dependence on color and morphological type in the sense that redder, earlier type disk galaxies rotate faster than bluer, later type disk galaxies for most luminosities. The VL relation at I and K bands is independent of surface brightness, size, and light concentration. The log slope of the I- and K-band size-luminosity (RL) relations is a strong function of morphology and varies from 0.25 to 0.5, with a mean of 0.32 for all Hubble types. At most luminosities, early-type disk galaxies have shorter scale lengths than later type ones. The average dispersion σln(RL) decreases from 0.33 at I band to 0.29 at K, likely due to the 2MASS selection bias against lower surface brightness galaxies. The VL and RL residuals are largely uncorrelated with each other with a correlation coefficient r = -0.16 and Δ log V|L/Δ log R|L = -0.07 ± 0.01; the RV - RL residuals show a weak positive correlation with r = 0.53. These correlations suggest that scatter in luminosity is not a significant source of the scatter in the VL and RL relations. We discuss in two Appendices various pitfalls of standard analytical derivations of galaxy scaling relations, including the Tully-Fisher relation with different slopes. Our galaxy database is available at http://www.astro.queensu.ca/~courteau/data/VRL2007.dat.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Ecology, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/15fa52ef9cf6d824bf37e12226ade0ac3813d00c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. Volker Springel
  3. L. Hernquist
  4. R. Dav'e
  5. R. Somerville
  6. T. Naab
  7. Simon D. M. White
  8. M. Vogelsberger

In Ecology

  1. J. Trevor Mendel
  2. Simon D. M. White
  3. David R. Patton
  4. Sara L. Ellison
  5. P. Torrey
  6. F. V. D. Bosch
  7. M. Cappellari
  8. Volker Springel

In Instrumentation

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. Volker Springel
  3. L. Hernquist
  4. R. Somerville
  5. R. Dav'e
  6. Simon D. M. White
  7. A. Dekel
  8. M. Vogelsberger

Citations in the corpus