PROBING THE INTERGALACTIC MEDIUM/GALAXY CONNECTION. V. ON THE ORIGIN OF Lyα AND O vi ABSORPTION AT z < 0.2

By J. Xavier Prochaska, B. Weiner, H. Chen, J. Mulchaey, K. L. C. U. Observatories, U. Cruz, U. Arizona, U. Chicago, C. Observatories, Mit. 2011

212 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We analyze the association of galaxies with Lyα and O vi absorption, the most commonly detected transitions of the low-z intergalactic medium (IGM), in the fields of 14 quasars with zem = 0.06–0.57. Confirming previous studies, we observe a high covering fraction for Lyα absorption to impact parameter ρ = 300 h−172 kpc: 33/37 of our L > 0.01 L* galaxies show Lyα equivalent width WLyα ⩾ 50 mÅ. Galaxies of all luminosity L > 0.01 L* and spectral type are surrounded by a diffuse and ionized circumgalactic medium (CGM), whose baryonic mass is estimated at ∼1010.5 ± 0.3M☉ for a constant NH = 1019 cm−2. The virialized halos and extended CGM of present-day galaxies are responsible for most strong Lyα absorbers (WLyα > 300 mÅ) but cannot reproduce the majority of observed lines in the Lyα forest. We conclude that the majority of Lyα absorption with WLyα = 30–300 mÅ occurs in the cosmic web predicted by cosmological simulations and estimate a characteristic width for these filaments of ≈400 h−172 kpc. Regarding O vi, we observe a near unity covering fraction to ρ = 200 h−172 kpc for L > 0.1 L* galaxies and to ρ = 300 h−172 kpc for sub-L* (0.1 L* < L < L*) galaxies. Similar to our Lyα results, stronger O vi systems (W1031 > 70 mÅ) arise in the virialized halos of L > 0.1 L* galaxies. Unlike Lyα, the weaker O vi systems (W1031 ≈ 30 mÅ) arise in the extended CGM of sub-L* galaxies. The majority of O vi gas observed in the low-z IGM is associated with a diffuse medium surrounding individual galaxies with L ≈ 0.3 L* and rarely originates in the so-called warm-hot IGM (predicted by cosmological simulations.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e8f6fb4fba8e45f9abd1d1cd6b6fa6c66ba4fb48

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. R. Dav'e
  3. C. Faucher-Giguére
  4. E. Quataert
  5. L. Hernquist
  6. Volker Springel
  7. A. Dekel
  8. D. Keres̆

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

  1. C. Steidel
  2. D. Erb
  3. Naveen A. Reddy
  4. C. Brook
  5. M. Pettini
  6. E. Quataert
  7. J. Xavier Prochaska
  8. A. Shapley

In Instrumentation

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. A. Shapley
  3. R. Dav'e
  4. Naveen A. Reddy
  5. C. Steidel
  6. D. Erb
  7. M. Pettini
  8. E. Quataert

Citations in the corpus