Evidence for the Efficacy of Self-Report in Predicting Nonviolent and Violent Criminal Recidivism

By D. Kroner, Wagdy Loza. 2001

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/15e56564c0dcba514d4ce1643c909ccbc424b578

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Glenn D. Walters
2. M. Campbell
3. Sheila French
4. P. Gendreau
5. J. Mills
6. D. Kroner
7. Toni Hemmati
8. J. Bonta

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Glenn D. Walters
2. M. Campbell
3. Sheila French
4. P. Gendreau
5. J. Mills
6. D. Kroner
7. Toni Hemmati
8. J. Bonta

Citations in the corpus

• Most items in structured risk assessment instruments do not predict violence (2011, unknown): “…Nicholson, Hemmati, Bernfeld, & Quinsey, 2002; Grann, Belfrage, & Tengström, 2000; Gray et al., 2003, 2004; Grevatt, Thomas-Peter, & Hughes, 2004; Kroner & Loza, 2001; Kroner & Mills, 2001; Mills, Kroner, & Hemmati, 2007; Morrissey et al., 2007; Nicholls, Ogloff, & Douglas, 2004; Snowden,…”
• The Measures of Criminal Attitudes and Associates (MCAA) (2004, background): “Studies have shown the GSIR to be predictive of both general and violent recidivism (Bonta, Harman, Hann, & Cormier, 1996; Kroner & Loza, 2001; Wormith & Goldstone, 1984).”
• The Prediction of Violence in Adult Offenders (2009, background): “…of individual studies have compared the relative utility of risk instruments for the prediction of violence in adults (e.g., see Dahle, 2006; Douglas, Yeomans, & Boer, 2005; Glover et al., 2002; Grann, Belfrage, & Tengström, 2000; Kroner & Loza, 2001; Mills & Kroner, 2006; Rice & Harris, 1995).”
• Risk-Appraisal Versus Self-Report in the Prediction of Criminal Justice Outcomes (2006, methodology): “The self-report method is economical to the extent that it is amenable to group administration and computer scoring (Kroner & Loza, 2001).”
• The Accuracy of Five Risk Appraisal Instruments in Predicting Institutional Misconduct and New Convictions (2001, result): “In addition, the range of AUCs in this study (.596 to .754) are similar to those found in other recidivist studies (.64 to .80, Kroner & Loza, 2001; .76, Quinsey et al., 1998; medium = .73, Mossman, 1994; .61 to .73, Gardner et al., 1996).”