Dynamics in socio-technical systems : typology of change processes and contrasting case studies
By Frank W. Geels, René Kemp. 2007
543 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Management Science and Operations Research, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/15babc27e29ad0d4d02a17388d2fb2ededffa301
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
- Harald Rohracher
- P. Newell
- Benjamin Sovacool
- Lee-Ann Sutherland
- Philipp Späth
- Lucy Baker
- Sarah Peter
- L. Zagata
In Management Science and Operations Research
- A. Goldthau
- P. Newell
- Adrian Smith
- Lucy Baker
- Harald Rohracher
- Peter E. Wells
- Kevin Maréchal
- Christian Berggren
In Sociology and Political Science
- Benjamin Sovacool
- Harald Rohracher
- Lee-Ann Sutherland
- Philipp Späth
- Sarah Peter
- L. Zagata
- P. Newell
- Lucy Baker
Citations in the corpus
- Conceptualising multi-regime interactions: The role of the agriculture sector in renewable energy transitions (2015, background): “While a regime does not necessarily equate to a sector – Geels and Kemp (2007) are clear that a regime can exist at multiple levels – for these purposes, it is necessary to consider the whole agriculture production sector a regime, because renewable energy production occurs across farming types…”
- Transition and transformation: A bibliometric analysis of two scientific networks researching socio-technical change (2014, unknown): “For the transformation literature, the largest network is a lot smaller: 19 authors, led by Kemp (see Fig.”
- The uniqueness of the energy security, justice, and governance problem☆ (2012, background): “…buy low carbon one), reverting directions taken (e.g. re-organize human life and economic activity towards urban 2 For a discussion on change in socio-technological systems see Geels and Kemp (2007). areas and concentrate population in order to reduce carbon intensity), or simply switching habits.”
- Transition failure: Understanding continuity in the automotive industry (2012, background): “Broadly speaking, those concerned with a ‘transitions’ approach when seeking to understand the trajectory of future change [3–6] consider that there can be socio-economic or environmental imperatives underpinning the need for transition towards more sustainable structures and practices.”
- Transition pathways revisited: Established firms as multi-level actors in the heavy vehicle industry (2015, background): “The regime is ‘dynamically stable’ (Geels and Kemp, 2007), implying that it can accommodate incremental innovations along established trajectories; however, it has problems in driving radical technological innovation.”
- Local Demonstrations for Global Transitions—Dynamics across Governance Levels Fostering Socio-Technical Regime Change Towards Sustainability (2012, result): “Moreover, radical shifts are usually impossible to identify from a close view, where changes are rather gradual and patchy – in contrast to the long-term historic perspective transition case studies often take (see, e.g. Geels, 2005; Geels & Kemp, 2007).”
- An Evolutionary Perspective on the Economics of Energy Consumption: The Crucial Role of Habits (2009, background): “In other words, provided that a habit has been formed through the satisfactory repetition of a given behavior and that the goal associated with that habit is activated,19 the presence of the specific cue automatically triggers the habitual behavior.”
- The political economy of energy transitions in Mozambique and South Africa: The role of the Rising Powers (2016, background): “It is expected that structural changes in the socio-technical system occur where there are ‘alignments’ between the three levels resulting in ‘transformations’ (Geels and Kemp 2007) or in ‘transitions’ (Geels 2002).”
- An interdisciplinary perspective on industrial energy efficiency (2010, background): “Another way is to contribute to changes in practices and routines of existing regime actors [21,22] which can be done through for example, seminars and conferences.”
- Policy mixes for incumbency: Exploring the destructive recreation of renewable energy, shale gas ‘fracking,’ and nuclear power in the United Kingdom (2017, unknown): “Turnheim, B. & Geels, F.W., 2013.”