Cellulose nanowhiskers from coconut husk fibers: Effect of preparation conditions on their thermal and morphological behavior

By M. Rosa, E. Medeiros, J. Malmonge, K. Gregorski, D. Wood, Luiz H. C. Mattoso, G. Glenn, W. Orts, S. Imam. 2010

1,029 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomaterials, Biomedical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/15a2918d0f8a7afd47170c7e613916c789359b64

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomaterials

1. A. Dufresne
2. I. Ahmad
3. Ning Lin
4. H. Kargarzadeh
5. Sabu Thomas
6. Jin Huang
7. M. Mariano
8. Haipeng Yu

In Biomedical Engineering

1. I. Ahmad
2. A. Dufresne
3. Sabu Thomas
4. H. Kargarzadeh
5. Ning Lin
6. I. Abdullah
7. S. Alonzo
8. Famille M. Patriana

Citations in the corpus

• Effect of pre-acid-hydrolysis treatment on morphology and properties of cellulose nanowhiskers from coconut husk (2011, background): “It is known that the crystalline structure of cellulose I consists of two distinct crystalline forms: cellulose Ia (triclinic) and Ib (monoclinic) ( Park et al. 2010 ).”
• Isolation, preparation, and characterization of nanofibers from oil palm empty-fruit-bunch (OPEFB) (2010, result): “to degrade at higher temperature, even though those nanofibers had smaller residual mass at 500 C, which is in agreement with previous studies ( Roman and Winter 2004; Wang et al. 2007b).”
• Extraction of cellulose nanocrystals from mengkuang leaves (Pandanus tectorius) (2012, positive): “…cellulose nanocrystals, such as wood fibres Beck-Candanedo, Roman, & Gray, 2005), sisal (Garcia de Rodriguez, hielemans, & Dufresne, 2006; Moran, Alvarez, Cyras, & Vazquez, 008), pineapple leaves (Cherian et al., 2010), coconut husk fibres Rosa et al., 2010), and bananas (Deepa et al., 2011).”
• Effect of sugar palm nanofibrillated cellulose concentrations on morphological, mechanical and physical properties of biodegradable films based on agro-waste sugar palm (Arenga pinnata (Wurmb.) Merr) starch (2019, background): “In the past decades, there are many different agro-wastes that have been used in nanocellulose preparation, such as soy hull [17], sugarcane bagasse [18], wheat straw [19], pineapple leaves [20], rice straw [21], coconut husk fibres [22], water hyacinth fibre [23–28], and banana peels [29].”
• Comparing microcrystalline with spherical nanocrystalline cellulose from waste cotton fabrics (2012, result): “In contrast to the rod-like NCC with higher CrI after hydrolysis (Hamad and Hu 2010; Rosa et al. 2010), the CrI of the SNCC prepared in this study is slightly lower than that of MCC (Table 1).”