SemEval-2016 Task 3: Community Question Answering
By Preslav Nakov, Lluís Màrquez i Villodre, Alessandro Moschitti, Walid Magdy, Hamdy Mubarak, Abed Alhakim Freihat, James R. Glass, Bilal Randeree. 2019
206 citations recorded by the source corpus.
This paper describes the SemEval–2016 Task 3 on Community Question Answering, which we offered in English and Arabic. For English, we had three subtasks: Question–Comment Similarity (subtask A), Question–Question Similarity (B), and Question–External Comment Similarity (C). For Arabic, we had another subtask: Rerank the correct answers for a new question (D). Eighteen teams participated in the task, submitting a total of 95 runs (38 primary and 57 contrastive) for the four subtasks. A variety of approaches and features were used by the participating systems to address the different subtasks, which are summarized in this paper. The best systems achieved an official score (MAP) of 79.19, 76.70, 55.41, and 45.83 in subtasks A, B, C, and D, respectively. These scores are significantly better than those for the baselines that we provided. For subtask A, the best system improved over the 2015 winner by 3 points absolute in terms of Accuracy.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing, Evaluation & Benchmarks
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Hannaneh Hajishirzi
- Ashish Sabharwal
- Peter Clark
- Tushar Khot
- Luke S. Zettlemoyer
- Mohit Bansal
- Percy Liang
- Jianfeng Gao
In Natural Language Processing
- Hannaneh Hajishirzi
- Ashish Sabharwal
- Peter Clark
- Tushar Khot
- Luke S. Zettlemoyer
- Percy Liang
- Mohit Bansal
- Jonathan Berant
In Evaluation & Benchmarks
- Ashish Sabharwal
- Hannaneh Hajishirzi
- Tushar Khot
- Peter Clark
- Alessandro Moschitti
- Sewon Min
- Anette Frank
- Dina Demner-Fushman
Citations in the corpus
- Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answering (2018, background): “This solver tries to predict which choice best matches the question (Nakov et al., 2016), without relying on external knowledge.”
- Question Answering through Transfer Learning from Large Fine-grained Supervision Data (2017, background): “The recent advances in neural question answering lead to numerous datasets and successful models in these paradigms (Rajpurkar et al., 2016; Yang et al., 2015; Nguyen et al., 2016; Trischler et al., 2016).”
- Semi-supervised Question Retrieval with Gated Convolutions (2015, background): “Given the growing popularity of community QA forums, question retrieval has emerged as an important area of research (Nakov et al., 2015; Nakov et al., 2016).”
- Discourse Relation Sense Classification Using Cross-argument Semantic Similarity Based on Word Embeddings (2016, methodology): “Combining features based on word embeddings and similarity between arguments in Mihaylov and Nakov (2016) yielded state-of-the art performance in a similar task setup in Community Question Answering (Nakov et al., 2016), where two text arguments (question and answer) are to be ranked.”
- SemanticZ at SemEval-2016 Task 3: Ranking Relevant Answers in Community Question Answering Using Semantic Similarity Based on Fine-tuned Word Embeddings (2016, background): “The SemEval-2016 Task 3 on Community Question Answering 1 (Nakov et al., 2016) aims to solve this real-life problem.”
- A question-entailment approach to question answering (2019, methodology): “Question similarity has recently attracted international challenges [4, 5] and research efforts proposing a wide range of approaches, including logistic regression, Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), Long Short Term Memory cells (LSTMs), and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) [2, 6–8].”