SemEval-2016 Task 3: Community Question Answering

By Preslav Nakov, Lluís Màrquez i Villodre, Alessandro Moschitti, Walid Magdy, Hamdy Mubarak, Abed Alhakim Freihat, James R. Glass, Bilal Randeree. 2019

206 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This paper describes the SemEval–2016 Task 3 on Community Question Answering, which we offered in English and Arabic. For English, we had three subtasks: Question–Comment Similarity (subtask A), Question–Question Similarity (B), and Question–External Comment Similarity (C). For Arabic, we had another subtask: Rerank the correct answers for a new question (D). Eighteen teams participated in the task, submitting a total of 95 runs (38 primary and 57 contrastive) for the four subtasks. A variety of approaches and features were used by the participating systems to address the different subtasks, which are summarized in this paper. The best systems achieved an official score (MAP) of 79.19, 76.70, 55.41, and 45.83 in subtasks A, B, C, and D, respectively. These scores are significantly better than those for the baselines that we provided. For subtask A, the best system improved over the 2015 winner by 3 points absolute in terms of Accuracy.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing, Evaluation & Benchmarks

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Hannaneh Hajishirzi
  2. Ashish Sabharwal
  3. Peter Clark
  4. Tushar Khot
  5. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  6. Mohit Bansal
  7. Percy Liang
  8. Jianfeng Gao

In Natural Language Processing

  1. Hannaneh Hajishirzi
  2. Ashish Sabharwal
  3. Peter Clark
  4. Tushar Khot
  5. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  6. Percy Liang
  7. Mohit Bansal
  8. Jonathan Berant

In Evaluation & Benchmarks

  1. Ashish Sabharwal
  2. Hannaneh Hajishirzi
  3. Tushar Khot
  4. Peter Clark
  5. Alessandro Moschitti
  6. Sewon Min
  7. Anette Frank
  8. Dina Demner-Fushman

Citations in the corpus