A question-entailment approach to question answering

By Asma Ben Abacha, Dina Demner-Fushman. BMC Bioinformatics, 2019

305 citations recorded by the source corpus.

One of the challenges in large-scale information retrieval (IR) is developing fine-grained and domain-specific methods to answer natural language questions. Despite the availability of numerous sources and datasets for answer retrieval, Question Answering (QA) remains a challenging problem due to the difficulty of the question understanding and answer extraction tasks. One of the promising tracks investigated in QA is mapping new questions to formerly answered questions that are “similar”. We propose a novel QA approach based on Recognizing Question Entailment (RQE) and we describe the QA system and resources that we built and evaluated on real medical questions. First, we compare logistic regression and deep learning methods for RQE using different kinds of datasets including textual inference, question similarity, and entailment in both the open and clinical domains. Second, we combine IR models with the best RQE method to select entailed questions and rank the retrieved answers. To study the end-to-end QA approach, we built the MedQuAD collection of 47,457 question-answer pairs from trusted medical sources which we introduce and share in the scope of this paper. Following the evaluation process used in TREC 2017 LiveQA, we find that our approach exceeds the best results of the medical task with a 29.8% increase over the best official score. The evaluation results support the relevance of question entailment for QA and highlight the effectiveness of combining IR and RQE for future QA efforts. Our findings also show that relying on a restricted set of reliable answer sources can bring a substantial improvement in medical QA.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/86c8e5e2979377f87c7fdb2108497d074943d462

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Juliano Rabelo
  2. Randy Goebel
  3. Mi-Young Kim
  4. Ion Androutsopoulos
  5. Peter Szolovits
  6. Di Jin
  7. Petros Stavropoulos
  8. Ryan T. McDonald

In Molecular Biology

  1. Petros Stavropoulos
  2. Ryan T. McDonald
  3. Qiao Jin
  4. Pushpak Bhattacharyya
  5. Peter Szolovits
  6. Ion Androutsopoulos
  7. Di Jin
  8. Dimitris Pappas

Citations in the corpus