Reconstruction of the Sizes of Spherical Particles from Their Shadow Images. Part I: Theoretical Considerations

133 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Cloud Ice Properties: In Situ Measurement Challenges (2017, methodology): “The optical resolution limitations of imaging probes manifest themselves most strongly for smaller particles (Korolev et al. 1998a; Korolev 2007; Ulanowski et al. 2004; Connolly et al. 2007).”
The Microphysics of Ice and Precipitation Development in Tropical Cumulus Clouds (2015, methodology): “Following Lawson (2011), 2D-S images smaller than 365mm were processed with method ‘‘M4,’’ which resizes out-offocus ‘‘donuts’’ using the Korolev (2007) diffraction correction.”
Confronting the Challenge of Modeling Cloud and Precipitation Microphysics (2020, background): “Among the most basic of all in situ microphysical measurements is simply the droplet or ice particle SD, yet the size‐dependent uncertainty in such measurements remains difficult to robustly quantify, especially at the smallest particle sizes (e.g., Korolev, 2007; McFarquhar et al., 2017).”
Observations of ice multiplication in a weakly convective cell embedded in supercooled mid-level stratus (2010, methodology): “Round particles were size corrected due to being out of focus using the results of Korolev (2007).”