The effects of residents' social identity and involvement on their advocacy of incoming tourism

216 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Impact of Self-Congruity and Evaluation of the Place on WOM: Perspectives of Tourism Destination Residents (2021, background): “These factors include place satisfaction, salient identity, resident’s engagement with the place, and place expectations (Chen, Dwyer, and Firth 2015, 2018; Palmer, Koenig-Lewis, and Medi Jones 2013; Simpson and Siguaw 2008; So et al. 2018).”
The social crisis aftermath: tourist well-being during the COVID-19 outbreak (2020, background): “cacy of tourism development (Olya et al., 2018; Palmer et al., 2013), national identity in attraction”
Branding the destination versus the place: The effects of brand complexity and identification for residents and visitors (2017, background): “Third, the study contributes to the field of place advocacy and place ambassadorship (Braun et al., 2013; Palmer et al., 2013), since it can serve as one explanation of the motivation of residents becoming a place brand ambassador.”
Antecedents and Outcomes of Resident Empowerment through Tourism (2021, unknown): “…that several terms have been used interchangeably for resident engagement activities such as involvement (Ko and Stewart 2002; T. H. Lee 2013; Palmer, Koenig-Lewis, and Jones 2013), participation (Li 2006; Simmons 1994; Tosun 2006), knowledge and information (Cole 2006b; Joo et al.et al.…”