Visual speech speeds up the neural processing of auditory speech.

By V. van Wassenhove, K. W. Grant, David Poeppel. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005

889 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/153c3f8b787a99940e69a447fa9d36e4554e8cc5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Multimodal interaction: A review (2014, background): “Humans may process information faster and better when it is presented in multiple modalities (van Wassenhove et al., 2005).”
Development and Plasticity of Intra- and Intersensory Information Processing (2008, background): “…neurotrophic factor (BDNF), thereby closing the sensitive period window and ushering in a period of response stability during which time abnormal sensory experience is no longer able to drive persistent functional reorganization (Castren et al, 1992; Hanover et al, 1999; Hensch et al, 1998).”
The COGs (context, object, and goals) in multisensory processing (2016, background): “For example, task-irrelevant stimuli representing naturalistic movement (e.g. clips of water drops; Senkowski et al. 2007) or speech (van Wassenhove et al. 2005) trigger earlier and/or nonlinear ERPs starting at 120 ms post-stimulus (albeit the latter effects seem to be of anticipatory, not…”
Multisensory integration: flexible use of general operations (2014, neutral): “…phase reset is predictive (Figure 3D); as facial articulatory cues and head movements precede the auditory speech input (Chandrasekaran et al., 2009), they provide predictions that enable the auditory system to anticipate what is coming (Schroeder et al., 2008; van Wassenhove et al., 2005).”
Flexibility and Stability in Sensory Processing Revealed Using Visual-to-Auditory Sensory Substitution (2014, background): “…in situations where sensory inputs compete with one another, for example, when trying to decipher speech in a noisy environment (Kuchinsky et al. 2012), or during visual imagery (Amedi et al. 2005), but were also associated with normal audiovisual speech perception (van Wassenhove et al. 2005).”
Sensorimotor Integration in Speech Processing: Computational Basis and Neural Organization (2011, neutral): “On the perceptual side, we suggest, following other authors (Rauschecker and Scott, 2009; Sams et al., 2005; van Wassenhove et al., 2005), that under some circumstances forward predictions from the motor speech system can modulate the perception of others' speech.”
The Effect of Imagination on Stimulation: The Functional Specificity of Efference Copies in Speech Processing (2013, background): “This can benefit perception under noisy or challenging conditions in audition (e.g., Elhilali, Xiang, Shamma, & Simon, 2009; van Wassenhove et al., 2005; Grant & Seitz, 2000) and vision (e.g., Peelen, FeiFei, & Kastner, 2009; Summerfield et al., 2006; Kastner, Pinsk, De Weerd, Desimone, &…”
How prior expectations shape multisensory perception (2016, background): “…loss, auditory weight is reduced (Ernst and Banks, 2002; Helbig et al., 2012)), general sensory dominance or potentially inter-sensory attention (Foxe et al., 2013; Ross et al., 2007; Rouger et al., 2008; Schwartz, 2010; Senkowski et al., 2008; Talsma et al., 2007; van Wassenhove et al., 2005).”
Multisensory synesthetic interactions in the speeded classification of visual size (2006, background): “Synesthetic associations might be based on a presemantic/semantic level of processing at the stage in which an abstract, amodal representation of the stimuli (shaped on the basis of natural constraints) might be set up (cf. van Wassenhove et al., 2005).”
The processing of audio-visual speech: empirical and neural bases (2008, background): “There are claims that this is so (Skipper et al. 2005; van Wassenhove et al. 2005), and there is no doubt that activation in Broca's area can be shown to play a distinctive role in speech-reading and audio-visual speech (Sams et al. 2005; Pekkola et al. 2006).”