Destination image as a mediator between perceived risks and revisit intention: A case of post-disaster Japan

By E. Chew, Siti Aqilah Jahari. 2014

748 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/14fa9530f70295fc2f6aaf943fc26bf5cca0ed87

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

In Transportation

Citations in the corpus

Destination image and tourist behavioural intentions: A meta-analysis (2020, neutral): “The vast majority of previous studies highlighted the role of destination image in consumer attitude and behavioural intentions (Kim & Yoon, 2003; Hosany, Ekinci, & Uysal, 2006; Yüksel & Akgül, 2007; Chew & Jahari, 2014).”
How to define and measure risk perceptions (2019, background): “…research has focused on for example perceived risk for man-made and natural disasters like terrorism (Wolff & Larsen, 2014) or tsunamis (Chew & Jahari, 2014) on financial (Quintal, Lee, & Soutar, 2010), physical (Roehl & Fesenmaier, 1992), and (social-) psychological risks (Reichel, Fuchs, &…”
Examining Chinese College Students’ Intention to Travel to Japan Using the Extended Theory of Planned Behavior: Testing Destination Image and the Mediating Role of Travel Constraints (2017, background): “Destination image and travel constraints are two critical factors in the process of travel decision-making studies (Chen, Chen, & Okumus, 2013; Chen, Hua, & Wang, 2013; Chew & Jahari, 2014).”
The effect of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) risk perception on behavioural intention towards ‘untact’ tourism in South Korea during the first wave of the pandemic (March 2020) (2020, background): “First, the results indicate that attitude towards untact tourism was positively related to affective risk perception, which is in line with the findings from Chew and Jahari (2014), Shim and You (2015), and Portnoy et al. (2014).”
Effects of tourism information quality in social media on destination image formation: The case of Sina Weibo (2017, methodology): “This model has been generally accepted as the basic theoretical framework of destination image by subsequent studies (e.g., Chew & Jahari, 2014).”
Tourist risk perceptions and revisit intention: A critical review of literature (2017, background): “…An et al., 2010; Jin et al., 2016; Meng & Elliott, 2008; Quintal et al., 2010), attitude (e.g., Baker, 2014; Liu et al., 2013; Lu et al., 2016; Quintal et al., 2010), purchase and repurchase intention (e.g. Artuğer, 2015; Cetinsoz & Ege, 2013; Chew & Jahari, 2014; Sohn et al., 2016) (Table 5).”
Antecedents and outcomes of destination image of Malaysia (2017, background): “Despite the significance of these issues, the risk literature has barely examined perceived risk and destination image as distinct constructs within a single study to understand their impacts (Beerli & Martin, 2004; Chew & Jahari, 2014).”
Urban air pollution in China: destination image and risk perceptions (2017, positive): “These are typically not integrated: research on image tends to focus on positive aspects of a destination, whereas the risk literature explores aspects that cause concern, fear or worry (Chew & Jahari, 2014; Jeuring & Becken, 2013).”
Factors influencing destination image and visit intention among young women travellers: role of travel motivation, perceived risks, and travel constraints (2017, background): “Researchers (Chen, Hua, et al., 2013; Chew & Jahari, 2014) made calls for future research to examine the relationships of these factors further in different demographic and geographic contexts.”