Two‐dimensional adiabatic flows on to a black hole – I. Fluid accretion

By R. Blandford, M. Begelman. 2003

152 citations recorded by the source corpus.

When gas accretes on to a black hole, at a rate either much less than or much greater than the Eddington rate, it is likely to do so in an ‘adiabatic’ or radiatively inefficient manner. Under fluid (as opposed to magnetohydrodynamic) conditions, the disc should become convective and evolve toward a state of marginal instability. We model the resulting disc structure as ‘gyrentropic’, with convection proceeding along common surfaces of constant angular momentum, Bernouilli function and entropy, called ‘gyrentropes’. We present a family of two-dimensional, self-similar models that describes the time-averaged disc structure. We then suppose that there is a self-similar, Newtonian torque, which dominates the angular momentum transport and that the Prandtl number is large so that convection dominates the heat transport. The torque drives inflow and meridional circulation and the resulting flow is computed. Convective transport will become ineffectual near the disc surface. It is conjectured that this will lead to a large increase of entropy across a ‘thermal front’, which we identify as the effective disc surface and the base of an outflow. The conservation of mass, momentum and energy across this thermal front permits a matching of the disc models to self-similar outflow solutions. We then demonstrate that self-similar disc solutions can be matched smoothly on to relativistic flows at small radius and thin discs at large radius. This model of adiabatic accretion is contrasted with some alternative models that have been discussed recently. The disc models developed in this paper should be useful for interpreting numerical, fluid dynamical simulations. Related principles to those described here may govern the behaviour of astrophysically relevant, magnetohydrodynamic disc models.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/14e1a558274fdf1bf71a5c9f2e9af95f4b8cf3b3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Ramesh Narayan
  2. M. Volonteri
  3. F. Yuan
  4. A. Sa̧dowski
  5. G. Ghisellini
  6. F. Tavecchio
  7. De-Fu Bu
  8. M. Begelman

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. Ramesh Narayan
  2. F. Yuan
  3. G. Ghisellini
  4. F. Tavecchio
  5. A. Sa̧dowski
  6. M. Begelman
  7. M. Volonteri
  8. De-Fu Bu

Citations in the corpus