NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF HOT ACCRETION FLOWS. III. REVISITING WIND PROPERTIES USING THE TRAJECTORY APPROACH

By F. Yuan, Z. Gan, Ramesh Narayan, A. Sa̧dowski, De-Fu Bu, Xue-Ning Bai. 2015

137 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Previous MHD simulations have shown that wind must exist in black hole hot accretion flows. In this paper, we continue our study by investigating the detailed properties of wind and the mechanism of wind production. For this aim, we make use of a 3D general relativistic MHD simulation of hot accretion flows around a Schwarzschild black hole. To distinguish real wind from turbulent outflows, we track the trajectories of the virtual Lagrangian particles from simulation data. We find two types of real outflows, i.e., a jet and a wind. The mass flux of wind is very significant, and its radial profile can be described by M ˙ wind ≈ M ˙ BH r / 20 r s ?> , with M ˙ BH ?> being the mass accretion rate at the black hole horizon and rs being the Schwarzschild radius. The poloidal wind speed almost remains constant once they are produced, but the flux-weighted wind speed roughly follows v p , wind ( r ) ≈ 0.25 v k ( r ) ?> , with vk(r) being the Keplerian speed at radius r. The mass flux of the jet is much lower, but the speed is much higher, v p , jet ?> ∼ (0.3–0.4)c. Consequently, both the energy and momentum fluxes of the wind are much larger than those of the jet. The wind is produced and accelerated primarily by the combination of centrifugal force and magnetic pressure gradient, while the jet is mainly accelerated by the magnetic pressure gradient. Finally, we find that the wind production efficiency ϵ wind ≡ E ˙ wind / M ˙ BH c 2 ∼ 1 / 1000 ?> is in good agreement with the value required from large-scale galaxy simulations with active galactic nucleus feedback.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f4e71882c89d4be66357cda316e9516b345a9df5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. L. Hernquist
  2. Volker Springel
  3. Shy Genel
  4. P. Torrey
  5. M. Vogelsberger
  6. D. Nelson
  7. F. Marinacci
  8. A. Pillepich

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. L. Hernquist
  2. M. Vogelsberger
  3. P. Torrey
  4. Shy Genel
  5. Volker Springel
  6. D. Nelson
  7. F. Marinacci
  8. Rüdiger Pakmor

Citations in the corpus