Ways and options for aircraft structural health management

By C. Boller. 2001

183 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Civil and Structural Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/147a69d18031e65569ab9f52f02129fd06ceb3ba

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. Jianping Yao
2. A. Pisano
3. Chee Kiong Soh

In Civil and Structural Engineering

1. Chee Kiong Soh
2. Suresh Bhalla
3. Yee Yan Lim
4. Raffaella Di Sante
5. Charles R. Farrar
6. Gyuhae Park
7. Wieslaw J. Staszewski
8. R. N. Swamy

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. Gaozhi George Xiao
2. Debbie G. Senesky
3. Nezih Mrad
4. Honglei Guo
5. Jianping Yao
6. A. Pisano
7. Chee Kiong Soh
8. Raffaella Di Sante

Citations in the corpus

• Structural identification and damage diagnosis using self-sensing piezo-impedance transducers (2006, background): “Boller (2001) raised several difficulties encountered in the inspection and maintenance of aging aircraft due to increasingly strict requirements and the high cost of inspection.”
• Fiber Optic Sensors for Structural Health Monitoring of Air Platforms (2011, background): “Although conventional schedule-based inspections contribute greatly to the safety and reliability of these platforms, they are also the main contributors to the high operation costs [3].”
• Harsh Environment Silicon Carbide Sensors for Health and Performance Monitoring of Aerospace Systems: A Review (2009, background): “In addition, a large number of operational aircrafts have exceeded their design lifetime, which asserts the need for precise health monitoring to improve the safety of aerospace fleets [14].”